Electoral systems

From binaryoption
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. Electoral Systems

An electoral system is a method for converting votes into seats in a political body, such as a legislature. It is a fundamental component of any representative democracy, and the choice of system has a profound impact on the political landscape, the representation of different groups, and the stability of government. Understanding electoral systems is crucial for informed civic engagement and for analyzing political outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the major types of electoral systems, their strengths and weaknesses, and related concepts.

Core Concepts

Before diving into specific systems, it’s important to understand some key terms:

  • Constituency (or Electoral District): A geographical area represented by a single elected official, or a small number of officials.
  • Ballot Structure: How voters mark their preferences on a ballot. This varies significantly across systems.
  • Proportionality: The extent to which the number of seats a party wins reflects its overall share of the vote. High proportionality means a closer match between votes and seats.
  • Majority Rule: A system where the candidate or party with more than 50% of the vote wins.
  • Plurality Rule: A system where the candidate with the most votes, even if less than 50%, wins.
  • Threshold: A minimum percentage of the vote a party must achieve to gain representation in a legislature.
  • Vote Weighting: Whether all votes are equal, or if some votes are given more weight than others.

Major Types of Electoral Systems

There are several broad categories of electoral systems, each with numerous variations.

      1. 1. Plurality/First Past the Post (FPTP)

This is arguably the simplest electoral system. Voters select one candidate in their constituency, and the candidate with the most votes wins. It’s often referred to as “winner-take-all.” United Kingdom and Canada are prominent examples.

  • Strengths: Generally produces strong, stable majority governments. Easy to understand and administer. Creates a clear link between voters and their local representative. Tends to favor larger parties.
  • Weaknesses: Can lead to disproportional results, where a party can win a majority of seats with less than a majority of the vote. Wastes votes for candidates who don't win. Discourages voting for smaller parties. Can lead to strategic voting (voting for a less preferred candidate who has a better chance of winning). May underrepresent minority groups. Susceptible to gerrymandering.
  • Tactical Analysis: Tactical Voting is a common strategy under FPTP. Voters often consider not just their preferred candidate, but also which candidate is most likely to defeat their least preferred candidate. See also Duverger's Law, which predicts that FPTP systems will lead to a two-party system. Strategic Polling can help predict outcomes.
  • Indicators: The Effective Number of Electoral Parties (ENEP) is a key indicator, often low under FPTP, reflecting the dominance of a few parties. Gallagher Index measures disproportionality.
  • Trends: Declining support for FPTP in many countries due to concerns about fairness and representation.
      1. 2. Majority Rule Systems

These systems require a candidate to receive a majority (more than 50%) of the votes to win. If no candidate achieves a majority in the first round, a second round (runoff) is held.

  • Two-Round System (TRS): Voters vote in the first round. If no candidate wins a majority, the top two candidates compete in a second round. France uses this system for presidential elections.
  • Alternative Vote (AV) / Ranked Choice Voting (RCV): Voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate has a majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed to the voters' next preference. This process continues until a candidate has a majority. Australia uses AV for its House of Representatives.
  • Strengths: Ensures the winning candidate has the support of a majority of voters. Reduces the likelihood of electing a candidate opposed by a large proportion of the electorate. AV/RCV can encourage candidates to appeal to a wider range of voters.
  • Weaknesses: TRS can be expensive and time-consuming if a runoff is needed. AV/RCV can be more complex for voters to understand. Can still lead to strategic voting, although less so than FPTP.
  • Technical Analysis: The Borda count is a method used in analyzing ranked-preference voting systems like AV/RCV. Condorcet Winner identifies a candidate who would win in a head-to-head contest against every other candidate.
  • Trends: Increasing adoption of RCV in local and state elections in the United States.
      1. 3. Proportional Representation (PR) Systems

PR systems aim to allocate seats in proportion to the votes received by each party. These systems generally result in multi-party legislatures and coalition governments.

  • Party-List PR: Voters vote for a party, not individual candidates. Seats are allocated to parties based on their share of the vote. Parties then fill the seats with candidates from their lists. Two main types:
   * Closed List: Parties determine the order of candidates on the list.
   * Open List: Voters can express a preference for individual candidates within a party list.
  • Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (MMP): Combines elements of FPTP and PR. Voters have two votes – one for a local candidate (FPTP) and one for a party list (PR). Germany and New Zealand use MMP.
  • Single Transferable Vote (STV): Voters rank candidates in order of preference. A quota is calculated (e.g., Droop quota). Candidates who reach the quota are elected, and their surplus votes are redistributed to the voters' next preference. This process continues until all seats are filled. Used in Ireland and Malta.
  • Strengths: Highly proportional, ensuring fair representation for all parties. Gives voice to smaller parties and minority groups. Encourages coalition building and compromise.
  • Weaknesses: Can lead to unstable coalition governments. May weaken the link between voters and their local representative (especially in closed-list systems). Can give disproportionate power to party leaders in determining candidate lists. May make it difficult for voters to hold individual representatives accountable.
  • Strategies: List Manipulation is a strategy employed by parties to influence the order of candidates on party lists and maximize their chances of election. Coalition Formation is a critical process in PR systems.
  • Indicators: The Hare quota and Droop quota are used to determine the number of votes needed for election in STV systems. Disproportionality Index assesses the deviation from perfect proportionality.
  • Trends: Growing interest in PR systems as concerns about representation and fairness increase.
      1. 4. Other Systems
  • Limited Voting: Voters cast fewer votes than the number of seats available in a constituency. Encourages strategic voting and can lead to minority representation.
  • Block Voting: Voters can vote for multiple candidates in a constituency. Favors larger parties.
  • Cumulative Voting: Voters can allocate their votes to a single candidate or distribute them among multiple candidates.

Factors Influencing Electoral System Choice

The choice of an electoral system is often influenced by a variety of factors, including:

  • Historical context: Existing political traditions and institutions.
  • Social diversity: The degree of ethnic, religious, and linguistic diversity in a country.
  • Political culture: The values and attitudes of the electorate.
  • Party system: The number and strength of political parties.
  • Constitutional considerations: Existing constitutional provisions.
  • Desire for stability vs. representation: A trade-off often exists between these two goals.

Consequences of Electoral Systems

Electoral systems have significant consequences for:

  • Party System: FPTP tends to create two-party systems; PR systems tend to create multi-party systems.
  • Government Formation: FPTP often leads to single-party majority governments; PR systems often lead to coalition governments.
  • Representation of Minority Groups: PR systems generally provide better representation for minority groups.
  • Voter Turnout: The impact on voter turnout is complex and depends on a variety of factors.
  • Political Stability: FPTP is often seen as promoting political stability, while PR systems can be more prone to instability.
  • Accountability: The link between voters and representatives can vary depending on the system.

Electoral System Reform

Reforming an electoral system is a complex undertaking with potentially far-reaching consequences. It often requires broad political consensus and careful consideration of the potential impacts. Electoral Engineering refers to the deliberate manipulation of electoral systems to achieve specific political outcomes. Gerrymandering is a specific form of electoral manipulation that involves drawing electoral district boundaries to favor a particular party. Duverger's Law provides a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between electoral systems and party systems.

Related Concepts & Resources



Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=Electoral_systems&oldid=40456"