Attribution theory

1. Attribution Theory

Attribution theory is a social psychological theory concerning the processes by which individuals explain the causes of behavior and events. It attempts to understand how people make sense of the world around them, specifically why things happen and what it means for themselves and others. This is particularly relevant in trading, especially in the context of binary options, where analyzing past performance (your own and the market’s) is crucial for future success. Understanding attribution theory can help traders avoid common biases and make more rational decisions.

Origins and Key Figures

The formal study of attribution began in earnest in the 1950s and 1960s, with key contributions from several researchers.

Fritz Heider (1958): Considered the father of attribution theory, Heider proposed that people are essentially naive psychologists, constantly striving to understand the causes of events. He differentiated between internal attribution (attributing behavior to personal characteristics, such as ability or motivation) and external attribution (attributing behavior to situational factors). Heider’s work laid the foundation for subsequent research. For example, a trader consistently losing money might internally attribute it to their poor risk management skills or externally attribute it to unfavorable market conditions.

Harold Kelley (1967): Kelley’s covariation model focused on how people determine the cause of behavior by observing the patterns of co-occurrence of different factors. He proposed that individuals look at three main dimensions:

   * Consensus: Do other people behave the same way in the same situation?
   * Distinctiveness: Does the person behave differently in different situations?
   * Consistency: Does the person behave the same way in the same situation over time?

Bernard Weiner (1972, 1985): Weiner expanded on Heider's work by focusing on the causal attributions people make for successes and failures. He proposed that attributions are categorized along three dimensions:

   * Locus of causality: Internal vs. External (similar to Heider).
   * Stability: Stable vs. Unstable (whether the cause is likely to change over time).
   * Controllability: Controllable vs. Uncontrollable (whether the person has control over the cause).

These dimensions have significant implications for emotional reactions and future behavior. For example, attributing a losing trade to an unstable, uncontrollable factor (like random market noise) might lead to less discouragement than attributing it to a stable, uncontrollable factor (like a lack of trading talent).

Attributional Dimensions in Detail

Let's delve deeper into each of the key dimensions identified by Weiner.

Locus of Causality: Internal vs. External

This dimension addresses whether the cause of an event is located within the person (internal) or in the situation (external).

Internal Attribution: The behavior is caused by something about the person, like their ability, effort, personality, or mood. A successful trade might be attributed to the trader's skill in using technical analysis or their diligent chart pattern recognition. A losing trade might be attributed to impulsiveness or a lack of discipline.

External Attribution: The behavior is caused by something about the situation, like luck, task difficulty, or the actions of others. A successful trade might be attributed to a favorable news event or a predictable trend. A losing trade might be attributed to unexpected market volatility or a false signal from an indicator.

Stability: Stable vs. Unstable

This dimension concerns whether the cause is enduring and consistent over time or temporary and fluctuating.

Stable Attribution: The cause is relatively permanent and unlikely to change. Attributing trading success to inherent talent or a consistently accurate trading strategy falls into this category. Attributing failure to a fundamental lack of understanding of candlestick patterns is also stable.

Unstable Attribution: The cause is temporary and subject to change. Attributing success to a lucky streak or a temporary market anomaly is unstable. Attributing failure to fatigue or a momentary lapse in concentration is also unstable.

Controllability: Controllable vs. Uncontrollable

This dimension focuses on whether the person has control over the cause of the event.

Controllable Attribution: The cause is something the person can influence or change. Effort, study, and the choice of risk tolerance are all controllable factors. A trader can consciously choose to spend more time learning about foreign exchange or to adjust their position size.

Uncontrollable Attribution: The cause is something the person cannot influence. Natural disasters, the actions of central banks, or inherent limitations in one's cognitive abilities are uncontrollable. A trader cannot directly control trading volume or the overall direction of the market.

Covariation Model

Kelley’s covariation model provides a framework for understanding how people systematically gather information to make attributions. The model suggests that people assess three types of information:

Consensus: High consensus means many people behave the same way in the same situation. Low consensus means only a few people behave that way. If a large number of traders experience losses during a particular economic announcement, consensus is high, suggesting an external attribution (the announcement itself).

Distinctiveness: High distinctiveness means the person behaves differently in different situations. Low distinctiveness means the person behaves the same way across situations. If a trader consistently loses money only when trading a specific asset (e.g., gold), distinctiveness is high, suggesting an internal attribution related to their skills with that asset.

Consistency: High consistency means the person behaves the same way in the same situation over time. Low consistency means the person’s behavior varies. If a trader consistently loses money every time they use a particular binary options strategy, consistency is high, strengthening the likelihood of an internal or external attribution, depending on consensus and distinctiveness.

The covariation model proposes that people make attributions based on the pattern of these three dimensions. For example:

High consensus, high distinctiveness, high consistency: Likely external attribution.
Low consensus, low distinctiveness, high consistency: Likely internal attribution.

Attributional Biases

While the attribution process is often rational, it is also prone to several biases that can lead to inaccurate conclusions. These biases are particularly relevant for traders.

Fundamental Attribution Error: The tendency to overestimate the influence of internal factors and underestimate the influence of situational factors when explaining other people’s behavior. A trader might assume another trader’s success is due solely to skill, ignoring the role of luck or favorable market conditions.

Self-Serving Bias: The tendency to attribute successes to internal factors and failures to external factors. Traders often take credit for winning trades ("I'm a great analyst!") but blame external factors for losing trades ("The market was rigged!"). This bias can hinder learning and improvement.

Actor-Observer Bias: The tendency to attribute our own behavior to external factors and the behavior of others to internal factors. We might excuse our own losses as bad luck, while attributing others' losses to their incompetence.

Confirmation Bias: The tendency to seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them. A trader who believes in a particular technical indicator might selectively focus on instances where it provided accurate signals, ignoring instances where it failed.

Hindsight Bias: The tendency to believe, after an event has occurred, that one would have predicted it. "I knew that was going to happen!" This can lead to overconfidence and poor decision-making.

Implications for Binary Options Trading

Understanding attribution theory and its associated biases is crucial for successful binary options trading. Here’s how:

Accurate Self-Assessment: Challenge your attributions. Are you honestly assessing your strengths and weaknesses, or are you falling prey to self-serving bias? Keep a detailed trading journal to track your trades and analyze your performance objectively.

Realistic Expectations: Recognize the role of luck and randomness in trading. Not every winning trade is due to skill, and not every losing trade is due to incompetence.

Strategy Evaluation: Objectively evaluate your trading strategies. Don’t just focus on the wins. Analyze the losses to identify areas for improvement. Consider using backtesting to assess the historical performance of your strategies.

Risk Management: Attributions related to risk tolerance and money management are critical. If you consistently take on too much risk, acknowledge this and adjust your strategy.

Emotional Control: Understanding the emotional consequences of different attributions can help you manage your emotions and avoid impulsive decisions. Attributing losses to uncontrollable factors can help you remain calm and focused.

Adaptability: The market is constantly changing. Be willing to adjust your strategies based on new information and changing market conditions. Avoid getting stuck in rigid beliefs about how the market "should" behave. Consider adaptive trading strategies.

Avoid Overconfidence: Be wary of hindsight bias. Just because a trade worked out well doesn’t mean you could have predicted it.

Learning from Mistakes: Focus on controllable attributions. If you made a mistake, identify what you can do differently next time.

Conclusion

Attribution theory provides a valuable framework for understanding how people explain the causes of events and behaviors. In the context of binary options trading, it can help traders avoid common biases, make more rational decisions, and improve their overall performance. By consciously examining your attributions and challenging your assumptions, you can become a more disciplined, objective, and successful trader. Remember to continually analyze your trades, learn from your mistakes, and adapt to the ever-changing market dynamics. Consider exploring related concepts like cognitive dissonance and behavioral finance for a deeper understanding of the psychological factors that influence trading decisions. Regularly review fundamental analysis, technical indicators, and market sentiment to refine your approach.

|}

Start Trading Now

Register with IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account with Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to get: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners