Cognitive dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological theory describing the mental discomfort (dissonance) experienced by a person who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. This discomfort is triggered by a situation where a person’s belief clashes with new evidence perceived by the person. It can also occur when a decision is made that conflicts with previously held beliefs. Essentially, it's the feeling of psychological stress when your actions don't align with your beliefs, or when you hold conflicting beliefs simultaneously. This article will explore the theory in detail, its origins, causes, effects, reduction strategies, and its relevance to various aspects of life, including decision-making, persuasion, and even Behavioral Finance.

History and Origins

The theory of cognitive dissonance was first proposed by Leon Festinger in 1957 in his book *A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance*. Festinger's initial research stemmed from observing a doomsday cult. He and his colleagues infiltrated a cult that believed the world would end on a specific date. When the predicted date passed and the world continued, the researchers observed the cult members' reactions. Instead of abandoning their beliefs, many of the members doubled down on their faith, claiming that their devotion had saved the world. This observation led Festinger to theorize that individuals strive for internal consistency and will actively work to reduce the discomfort caused by inconsistencies. Prior to Festinger's work, psychological theories often focused on external factors driving behavior. Cognitive dissonance shifted the focus to internal psychological processes and the motivation to maintain consistency. His work built upon earlier ideas of balance theory, proposed by Fritz Heider, which explored interpersonal relationships and consistency. However, Festinger's theory was broader, applying to internal conflicts within an individual.

Core Principles

At the heart of cognitive dissonance theory are several key principles:

**Inconsistency Creates Discomfort:** The fundamental premise is that holding inconsistent cognitions (beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors) creates an aversive state of psychological tension. The magnitude of this discomfort is proportional to the importance of the cognitions involved and the degree of inconsistency.
**Motivation to Reduce Dissonance:** Individuals are motivated to reduce this dissonance and restore cognitive consistency. This motivation is a drive state, similar to hunger or thirst.
**Methods of Dissonance Reduction:** There are several ways individuals attempt to reduce dissonance, which will be detailed in a later section. These methods often involve altering beliefs, changing behaviors, or adding new cognitions to justify the inconsistency.
**Justification of Effort:** A specific facet of dissonance theory is the "justification of effort" effect. This proposes that people tend to attribute greater value to outcomes they have put significant effort into achieving, even if those outcomes are objectively less desirable. This is because acknowledging the effort was wasted creates dissonance.
**Post-Decision Dissonance:** After making a difficult decision, people often experience dissonance because they recognize the positive aspects of the rejected alternative and the negative aspects of the chosen one. This is particularly strong when the decision is important and irreversible.

Causes of Cognitive Dissonance

Several situations can trigger cognitive dissonance:

**Logical Inconsistency:** When two beliefs directly contradict each other. For example, believing smoking is harmful while continuing to smoke. This is often linked to Confirmation Bias, where individuals seek out information confirming existing beliefs.
**Cultural Norms:** Behaviors that violate cultural norms or expectations can create dissonance. For instance, someone who values honesty but tells a lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings.
**Decision-Making:** As mentioned earlier, making difficult choices often leads to post-decision dissonance. The more important the decision, the stronger the dissonance. This is why people often rationalize their choices after making them. Consider someone choosing between two investment options – Moving Averages might inform their decision, but dissonance will arise if the chosen option performs poorly.
**Insufficient Justification:** When individuals engage in behavior that contradicts their beliefs without sufficient external justification. Festinger and Carlsmith’s famous 1959 experiment demonstrated this: participants who were paid only $1 to lie about a boring task rated the task as more enjoyable than those who were paid $20. The $1 group experienced greater dissonance because they lacked sufficient external justification for lying, so they changed their attitude towards the task to reduce the discomfort.
**Effort Justification:** Experiencing negative outcomes after exerting significant effort. Consider a trader who spends considerable time analyzing Candlestick Patterns only to experience losses. They might convince themselves the strategy is sound to justify their effort.
**Exposure to Conflicting Information:** Encountering information that challenges existing beliefs. This is particularly relevant in today’s information age where individuals can readily access diverse perspectives. Analyzing Relative Strength Index (RSI) might reveal a trend contradicting their initial outlook.
**Forced Compliance:** Being pressured or coerced into behaving in a way that contradicts one’s beliefs. This is a common tactic used in persuasion and manipulation. Understanding Elliott Wave Theory doesn't prevent someone being coerced.

Effects of Cognitive Dissonance

The effects of cognitive dissonance can be wide-ranging, impacting thoughts, feelings, and behaviors:

**Attitude Change:** The most common outcome is a change in attitude to align with behavior. For example, someone who smokes despite knowing the health risks might downplay the risks or rationalize their habit.
**Behavioral Change:** Individuals may alter their behavior to reduce dissonance. A person who believes in environmental protection but drives a gas-guzzling car might switch to a more fuel-efficient vehicle.
**Rationalization and Justification:** People often create elaborate justifications for their actions or beliefs to reduce dissonance. This can involve distorting information, minimizing negative consequences, or blaming external factors. A trader using Fibonacci Retracements might rationalize losing trades by blaming market volatility.
**Selective Exposure:** Individuals tend to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs and avoid information that contradicts them. This is a form of Cognitive Bias that reinforces dissonance reduction.
**Reduced Self-Esteem:** Chronic dissonance can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, and reduced self-esteem.
**Increased Stress and Anxiety:** The mental discomfort associated with dissonance can contribute to stress and anxiety.
**Distorted Perception:** Dissonance can affect how people perceive and interpret information, leading to biased judgments.

Strategies for Dissonance Reduction

Individuals employ various strategies to reduce the discomfort caused by cognitive dissonance:

**Change One or More of the Cognitions:** This is the most direct approach. For example, a smoker might decide that smoking isn't actually that harmful.
**Add New Cognitions:** Adding new beliefs that justify the inconsistency. A smoker might argue that smoking helps them relax and manage stress.
**Reduce the Importance of the Cognitions:** Downplaying the significance of the conflicting beliefs. A smoker might minimize the importance of health compared to other aspects of their life.
**Reduce Perceived Choice:** Convincing oneself that there was no real alternative. A smoker might claim they are addicted and unable to quit.
**Alter the Behavior:** Changing the behavior to align with the belief. This is often the most difficult option, as it requires effort and self-discipline. A smoker might quit smoking.
**Trivialization:** Minimizing the importance of the inconsistency. "It's just one cigarette, it won't make a difference."
**Denial:** Refusing to acknowledge the inconsistency.
**Bolstering:** Emphasizing positive aspects of the chosen option or downplaying negative aspects. A trader might focus on past winning trades while ignoring recent losses. This relates to Risk Management.
**External Attribution:** Blaming external factors for the inconsistency. "The market made me sell."

Applications and Relevance

Cognitive dissonance theory has broad applications across various fields:

**Persuasion and Marketing:** Advertisers often use dissonance-inducing techniques to encourage consumers to change their attitudes or behaviors. Creating a need or highlighting a discrepancy between current and desired states.
**Political Psychology:** Understanding how voters reconcile conflicting information and maintain their political beliefs. This is especially relevant in polarized political climates.
**Health Psychology:** Explaining why people engage in unhealthy behaviors despite knowing the risks. Addressing dissonance is crucial in promoting health-related behavior change.
**Relationship Dynamics:** Understanding how individuals justify staying in unhealthy relationships or rationalize their partner’s behavior.
**Education:** Addressing students’ misconceptions and fostering critical thinking.
**Technical Analysis & Trading Psychology:** Traders frequently experience dissonance when their trading strategies result in losses. They may rationalize poor performance, blame external factors (like MACD Divergence failing), or selectively focus on winning trades. Understanding dissonance can help traders make more rational decisions and avoid emotional pitfalls. Concepts like Bollinger Bands can be misinterpreted to fit pre-existing biases, creating dissonance when the market moves outside those bands. Recognizing Head and Shoulders Patterns doesn't automatically guarantee a successful trade, and accepting this is crucial to avoiding dissonance.
**Fundamental Analysis & Investment Decisions:** Investors may experience dissonance when a stock they hold performs poorly despite favorable fundamental indicators like Price-to-Earnings Ratio. They might downplay the negative news or rationalize the decline.
**Day Trading & Risk Tolerance:** Day traders often face rapid gains and losses, leading to frequent dissonance. Managing risk effectively, understanding Support and Resistance Levels, and avoiding emotional trading are crucial for mitigating dissonance and maintaining a disciplined approach.
**Swing Trading & Position Sizing:** Swing traders need to reconcile their long-term outlook with short-term price fluctuations. Incorrect Position Sizing can amplify dissonance during losing trades.
**Forex Trading & Economic Indicators:** Forex traders analyze economic indicators like Non-Farm Payrolls and Interest Rate Decisions. Dissonance arises when the market reacts contrary to expectations.
**Cryptocurrency Trading & Volatility:** The high volatility of cryptocurrencies creates frequent dissonance for traders. Understanding Chart Patterns and employing risk management techniques are essential.

Criticisms and Limitations

While influential, cognitive dissonance theory has faced some criticisms:

**Difficulty in Measurement:** Measuring dissonance directly is challenging, as it is a subjective psychological state.
**Alternative Explanations:** Some researchers argue that other psychological processes, such as self-perception theory, can explain the same phenomena.
**Cultural Variations:** The strength of dissonance effects may vary across cultures.
**Individual Differences:** Individuals differ in their tolerance for dissonance and their preferred methods of reduction.
**Overemphasis on Rationality:** Some critics argue that the theory assumes individuals are more rational than they actually are. Behavioral Economics challenges this assumption.

Despite these criticisms, cognitive dissonance theory remains a cornerstone of social psychology and provides valuable insights into human behavior. Understanding the principles of dissonance can help us become more aware of our own biases and make more informed decisions. It highlights the powerful motivation we have to maintain internal consistency and the lengths we will go to in order to achieve it.

Psychology Social Psychology Cognitive Bias Confirmation Bias Behavioral Finance Decision Making Persuasion Attitude Change Self-Perception Theory Behavioral Economics

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners