Troubled Asset Relief Program

1. Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)

The **Troubled Asset Relief Program** (TARP) was a program enacted in the United States in October 2008 as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. It was designed to address the Subprime mortgage crisis by authorizing the U.S. Treasury to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to stabilize the financial system. This article provides a comprehensive overview of TARP, its origins, implementation, effects, and eventual winding down.

Background: The Financial Crisis of 2008

The financial crisis of 2008 was a severe worldwide economic crisis considered by many economists to be the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Its roots lay in the housing market, specifically the proliferation of subprime mortgages. These mortgages were issued to borrowers with poor credit histories, often with adjustable interest rates that reset to higher levels after an initial period.

As housing prices began to decline in 2006 and 2007, many subprime borrowers found themselves unable to make their mortgage payments. This led to a surge in foreclosures, which further depressed housing prices, creating a vicious cycle. The risk associated with these mortgages wasn't isolated; they had been bundled into complex financial instruments called mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and sold to investors worldwide.

When the housing market collapsed, the value of these securities plummeted, causing significant losses for financial institutions that held them. The interconnectedness of the financial system meant that the problems at one institution could quickly spread to others. Key indicators reflecting the crisis included:

• **LIBOR-OIS Spread:** This spread, measuring the difference between the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the overnight index swap (OIS) rate, widened dramatically, indicating a severe lack of trust among banks. See Interest Rate Spreads for more details.
• **Credit Default Swaps (CDS) spreads:** CDS spreads, used to insure against the default of debt, soared for financial institutions and mortgage-backed securities, signaling increased risk aversion. Credit Default Swaps explains this in detail.
• **VIX (Volatility Index):** The VIX, often referred to as the "fear gauge," spiked to record highs, reflecting extreme market volatility and uncertainty. Volatility Trading explores VIX strategies.
• **Yield Curve Inversion:** The yield curve, plotting the interest rates of bonds with different maturities, inverted, a historical predictor of recession. Yield Curve Analysis provides a thorough explanation.
• **Bearish Reversal Patterns:** Technical analysts observed classic bearish reversal patterns like head and shoulders and double tops in major stock indices, confirming downward momentum. Chart Patterns details these formations.
• **Moving Average Crossovers:** The 50-day moving average crossed below the 200-day moving average (a "death cross"), further reinforcing the bearish outlook. Moving Averages discusses their use in trend identification.
• **MACD Divergence:** A bearish divergence between the MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicator and price action signaled weakening momentum. MACD Indicator explains its calculation and interpretation.
• **RSI Overbought/Oversold Levels:** The Relative Strength Index (RSI) briefly entered overbought territory before plummeting, indicating a potential correction. RSI Indicator provides a comprehensive guide.
• **Fibonacci Retracement Levels:** Price action repeatedly tested and broke through key Fibonacci retracement levels, suggesting strong selling pressure. Fibonacci Trading outlines its application.
• **Volume Confirmation:** Declining volume during rallies and increasing volume during declines confirmed the bearish trend. Volume Analysis highlights its importance.
• **Elliott Wave Theory:** Some analysts interpreted the market decline as the beginning of a larger corrective wave within the Elliott Wave cycle. Elliott Wave Theory is a complex but popular analytical approach.
• **Bollinger Bands Squeeze:** Tightening Bollinger Bands preceded the market crash, indicating a period of low volatility followed by a potential breakout. Bollinger Bands details their construction and use.

The failure of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 marked a turning point, triggering a panic in the financial markets. Credit markets froze, making it difficult for businesses to borrow money. The stock market plummeted, wiping out trillions of dollars in wealth. The entire system was on the brink of collapse. Systemic Risk is a critical concept to understand in this context.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and TARP

In response to the escalating crisis, the U.S. Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act on October 3, 2008, which authorized the creation of TARP. The Act gave the Treasury Secretary broad authority to purchase "troubled assets" from financial institutions. The initial authorization was for $700 billion, though the actual amount disbursed was less.

The stated goals of TARP were to:

• **Stabilize the Financial System:** Restore confidence in the financial system and prevent a complete collapse.
• **Unfreeze Credit Markets:** Encourage banks to lend money to businesses and consumers.
• **Protect the Economy:** Mitigate the negative impact of the financial crisis on the broader economy.

Implementation of TARP

The implementation of TARP evolved over time, with several different approaches being used:

1. **Capital Purchase Program (CPP):** This was the initial and most prominent component of TARP. The Treasury purchased preferred stock in banks and other financial institutions. This injected capital into these institutions, bolstering their balance sheets and encouraging them to lend. In return, the Treasury received dividends on the preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock at a predetermined price. This was designed to give the government an opportunity to profit when the institutions recovered.

2. **Asset Relief Program (ARP):** This program was intended to purchase troubled assets, primarily mortgage-backed securities, from financial institutions. However, the market for these assets was illiquid and their value was uncertain, making it difficult to determine a fair price. The ARP was largely unsuccessful in achieving its original goals.

3. **Housing Programs:** TARP included several programs designed to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, such as the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA). These programs were met with limited success due to bureaucratic hurdles and eligibility requirements.

4. **Automotive Industry Support:** In late 2008 and early 2009, TARP funds were used to provide loans to General Motors and Chrysler, which were facing bankruptcy. The government took equity stakes in both companies as part of the bailout. This intervention was controversial, but it is credited with saving the U.S. auto industry.

5. **American International Group (AIG) Rescue:** AIG, a major insurance company, was on the verge of collapse due to its exposure to credit default swaps. The Federal Reserve and the Treasury provided AIG with a series of loans and capital injections, totaling over $180 billion, to prevent its failure. This rescue was also highly controversial. Moral Hazard became a prominent concern.

Effects of TARP

The effects of TARP were complex and debated.

• • Positive Effects:**

• **Stabilization of the Financial System:** TARP is widely credited with preventing a complete collapse of the financial system. The capital injections helped restore confidence in banks and prevented a widespread bank run.
• **Unfreezing of Credit Markets:** As banks regained capital and confidence, they began to lend money again, albeit cautiously. This helped to ease the credit crunch and support economic activity.
• **Prevention of a Deeper Recession:** Many economists believe that TARP helped to mitigate the severity of the recession and prevent it from becoming a full-blown depression.
• **Recovery of the Stock Market:** The stock market began to recover in early 2009, fueled by the stabilization of the financial system and the expectation of economic recovery. Key technical indicators like Trend Lines and Support and Resistance Levels confirmed the shift in momentum.

• • Negative Effects & Criticisms:**

• **Moral Hazard:** Critics argued that TARP created moral hazard by bailing out financial institutions that had taken excessive risks. This, they said, encouraged reckless behavior in the future. Risk Management became a focal point of post-crisis regulatory reform.
• **Cost to Taxpayers:** While the government ultimately recovered most of the money invested in TARP, the program still cost taxpayers billions of dollars.
• **Inequity:** Some argued that TARP disproportionately benefited large financial institutions and did little to help ordinary homeowners who were struggling with foreclosure.
• **Lack of Transparency:** The initial implementation of TARP was criticized for a lack of transparency, with limited information being provided to the public about how the funds were being used.
• **Limited Impact on Foreclosures:** The housing programs included in TARP were largely ineffective in preventing foreclosures. Foreclosure Prevention strategies required more targeted and effective solutions.
• **Distortion of Market Signals:** The intervention of the government in the financial markets distorted market signals and potentially prolonged the recession. Market Efficiency was questioned.

The Winding Down of TARP

As the economy began to recover, the Treasury gradually wound down TARP. Most of the preferred stock purchased under the CPP was repurchased by the banks, often at a profit to the government. The AIG rescue was completed in 2012, and the government sold its remaining stake in GM in 2013.

In December 2014, the Treasury announced that TARP had officially ended. The program had disbursed a total of $475 billion, and the government had recovered $441.1 billion, resulting in a net loss of $33.9 billion. However, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the economic benefits of TARP far outweighed its costs, preventing a much more severe recession. Cost-Benefit Analysis is essential for evaluating such programs.

Long-Term Implications and Regulatory Reform

TARP had a profound impact on the financial system and led to significant regulatory reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Dodd-Frank aimed to address the systemic risks that had contributed to the financial crisis by:

• **Increasing Capital Requirements for Banks:** Requiring banks to hold more capital to absorb losses.
• **Strengthening Oversight of Financial Institutions:** Creating new regulatory agencies and expanding the authority of existing ones.
• **Regulating Derivatives Markets:** Increasing transparency and regulation of the derivatives markets.
• **Protecting Consumers:** Creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to protect consumers from abusive financial practices.

The crisis also spurred debate about the role of government in the economy and the need for greater financial regulation. Macroprudential Regulation became a key focus for policymakers. Furthermore, the events of 2008 highlighted the importance of Diversification in investment portfolios and the dangers of excessive leverage. Understanding Risk Tolerance is crucial for investors.

Subprime mortgage crisis Great Depression Mortgage-backed securities Collateralized debt obligations Systemic Risk Moral Hazard Interest Rate Spreads Credit Default Swaps Volatility Trading Yield Curve Analysis Chart Patterns Moving Averages MACD Indicator RSI Indicator Fibonacci Trading Volume Analysis Elliott Wave Theory Bollinger Bands Trend Lines Support and Resistance Levels Risk Management Foreclosure Prevention Market Efficiency Cost-Benefit Analysis Macroprudential Regulation Diversification Risk Tolerance Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners