Spurious regression

1. Spurious Regression

Spurious regression is a statistical phenomenon occurring when two or more variables appear to be correlated, but their correlation is actually due to the influence of a third, unobserved variable, or simply due to chance. It’s a critical concept for anyone involved in statistical analysis, particularly in fields like econometrics, finance, and time series analysis. Mistaking a spurious relationship for a causal one can lead to flawed conclusions, poor predictions, and ultimately, bad decisions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of spurious regression, its causes, detection methods, and how to mitigate its effects, geared towards beginners.

What is Regression Analysis? A Quick Recap

Before diving into spurious regressions, let's briefly review regression analysis. Regression is a statistical method used to determine the relationship between a dependent variable (the one you're trying to predict) and one or more independent variables (the ones you're using to make the prediction). A simple linear regression attempts to find the “best-fit” line through a scatter of data points, represented by the equation:

y = α + βx + ε

Where:

• y is the dependent variable.
• x is the independent variable.
• α is the intercept (the value of y when x is 0).
• β is the slope (the change in y for a one-unit change in x).
• ε is the error term, representing the unexplained variation in y.

The goal of regression is to find the values of α and β that minimize the sum of squared errors (the difference between the actual y values and the values predicted by the regression line). A statistically significant regression suggests a relationship between x and y. However, significance doesn’t necessarily imply causation. This is where spurious regression comes into play.

The Core of Spurious Regression

Spurious regression occurs when a statistically significant regression result is obtained for variables that have *no* true underlying relationship. The apparent correlation is misleading. There are two primary causes:

1. **Common Trend (or Common Stochastic Trend):** This is the most common cause. Both variables might be independently trending over time, and these trends create the illusion of a correlation. Think of two stocks both rising during a bull market. They might appear correlated, but their rise is driven by the overall market trend, not by a relationship between the companies themselves. This is often seen with non-stationary time series. 2. **Omitted Variable Bias:** A third, unobserved variable influences both of the observed variables, creating a correlation between them even though neither directly affects the other. For example, ice cream sales and crime rates might be correlated, but this isn’t because eating ice cream causes crime. Both are likely influenced by warmer weather.

Illustrative Examples

Let’s look at some classic examples of spurious regression:

• **Pirates and Global Warming:** A famous (and humorous) example demonstrates the apparent strong negative correlation between the number of pirates and global temperature. As the number of pirates decreased over the last few centuries, global temperatures increased. Clearly, there’s no causal relationship. Both are influenced by time – as time progresses, the pirate population declines, and global temperatures increase due to other factors.
• **Butter Production in Bangladesh and US Stock Market Returns:** Another improbable correlation – butter production in Bangladesh and the returns of the S&P 500. These variables are likely unrelated, and any observed correlation is purely coincidental or driven by common, unobserved factors.
• **Number of People Who Drowned in Swimming Pools and Nicolas Cage Films Released:** Again, a spurious correlation. The number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings appear correlated, but this is almost certainly a coincidence.
• **Ice Cream Sales and Crime Rates:** As mentioned earlier, both are influenced by temperature. Higher temperatures lead to increased ice cream sales *and* increased crime rates.

These examples highlight the dangers of interpreting correlation as causation without careful consideration of underlying factors. A high R-squared value (a measure of how well the regression line fits the data) or a statistically significant p-value (indicating the likelihood of observing the data if there were no relationship) doesn’t guarantee a meaningful relationship. This is why understanding R-squared and p-values is important, but not sufficient.

Detecting Spurious Regression

Several techniques can help detect spurious regression:

1. **Time Series Plots:** Visually inspecting the time series plots of the variables can often reveal whether they share a common trend. If both variables are trending upwards or downwards over time, it's a red flag. Consider using a candlestick chart if dealing with financial data. 2. **Unit Root Tests:** These tests (e.g., the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test, the Phillips-Perron test) assess whether a time series is stationary. A non-stationary time series has a trend or seasonality and is more prone to spurious regression. If the variables are non-stationary (have a unit root), it strongly suggests the potential for spurious regression. 3. **Cointegration Tests:** If two or more non-stationary time series are cointegrated, it means there exists a long-run equilibrium relationship between them. Cointegration tests (e.g., the Engle-Granger two-step method, the Johansen test) can determine if a meaningful relationship exists despite the presence of trends. If they are not cointegrated, any observed relationship is likely spurious. 4. **Granger Causality Test:** This test determines whether one time series can be used to predict another. However, it’s important to remember that Granger causality doesn’t imply true causality; it only indicates predictive power. If neither variable Granger-causes the other, it suggests the relationship might be spurious. Understanding Granger Causality is crucial in time series analysis. 5. **Residual Analysis:** Examining the residuals (the differences between the actual and predicted values) from the regression can reveal patterns. If the residuals are serially correlated (i.e., correlated with their own past values), it suggests the regression is misspecified and might be spurious. Use a autocorrelation function (ACF) plot to visualize this. 6. **Theoretical Justification:** The most important test is often the most overlooked. Does the relationship between the variables make sense from a theoretical perspective? Is there a plausible mechanism by which one variable could influence the other? If not, the relationship is likely spurious. Consider the underlying fundamental analysis of the variables.

Mitigating Spurious Regression

If you suspect spurious regression, here are some strategies to address it:

1. **Differencing:** Transforming the variables by taking the difference between consecutive observations can remove trends and make the time series stationary. First-order differencing subtracts the previous value from the current value. Higher-order differencing can be used if necessary. 2. **Detrending:** Removing the trend from the data by fitting a trend line (e.g., linear, quadratic) and subtracting it from the original data. 3. **Cointegration Analysis:** If the variables are cointegrated, use an error correction model (ECM) to account for the long-run equilibrium relationship. 4. **Include Relevant Variables:** If you suspect an omitted variable is driving the correlation, try to identify and include it in the regression model. This requires careful consideration of the underlying factors influencing the variables. This relates to improving your technical indicators. 5. **Use Appropriate Statistical Models:** For time series data, consider using models specifically designed to handle non-stationary data, such as ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) models or VAR (Vector Autoregression) models. Learn about ARIMA models and their applications. 6. **Focus on Causality:** Don’t rely solely on correlation. Investigate potential causal mechanisms and use techniques like instrumental variables to establish a stronger causal link. Understanding causation vs correlation is paramount.

Spurious Regression in Financial Markets

Spurious regression is particularly prevalent in financial markets due to the inherent non-stationarity of many financial time series (e.g., stock prices, interest rates, exchange rates). Many technical indicators, such as moving averages, Bollinger Bands, and Relative Strength Index (RSI), can produce misleading signals if applied to non-stationary data.

• **Pair Trading:** A strategy that exploits apparent correlations between two stocks. If the correlation is spurious, the strategy is likely to fail.
• **Mean Reversion Strategies:** Assuming that prices will revert to their historical average is dangerous if the price series is non-stationary.
• **Trend Following Strategies:** While trend following can be profitable, it's important to distinguish between genuine trends and spurious correlations. Consider using Fibonacci retracements with caution.
• **Algorithmic Trading:** Algorithmic trading systems relying on spurious relationships can generate significant losses. Regularly backtest and validate your algorithms. Always consider risk management when designing algorithms.
• **Forex Trading:** Currency pairs can exhibit spurious correlations due to global economic factors. Pay attention to economic calendars and fundamental analysis.

Careful consideration of the statistical properties of the data and the underlying economic factors is crucial for successful trading and investment. Utilizing tools such as Elliott Wave Theory alongside statistical analysis can provide a more comprehensive view. Don't solely rely on MACD or other indicators without understanding the broader context. Consider Ichimoku Cloud to understand support and resistance levels. Always consider volume analysis alongside price action. Using stochastic oscillators requires careful interpretation. Be mindful of candlestick patterns and their limitations. Learn about chart patterns to identify potential trends. Understand support and resistance levels. Use moving average convergence divergence (MACD) with caution. Pay attention to average true range (ATR). Consider on-balance volume (OBV). Employ relative volatility index (RVI). Analyze Williams %R. Use money flow index (MFI). Monitor Keltner Channels. Understand Parabolic SAR. Utilize Donchian Channels. Consider Chaikin's A/D Line. Be aware of ADX.

Conclusion

Spurious regression is a common pitfall in statistical analysis, especially when dealing with time series data. Recognizing its causes, employing appropriate detection methods, and implementing mitigation strategies are essential for drawing valid conclusions and making informed decisions. Always remember that correlation does not equal causation, and a statistically significant result doesn’t necessarily indicate a meaningful relationship. Critical thinking, theoretical justification, and careful statistical analysis are key to avoiding the dangers of spurious regression.

Statistical Analysis Econometrics Time Series Analysis Regression Analysis Unit Root Tests Cointegration Granger Causality Non-stationary Time Series P-values R-squared

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners