Purchasing power parity

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is a theory in international economics that attempts to explain and predict exchange rates between currencies. It posits that exchange rates should eventually adjust to equalize the prices of identical goods and services in different countries. In simpler terms, a Big Mac should cost roughly the same in New York and London after accounting for the exchange rate. This article will delve into the nuances of PPP, its different forms, its limitations, and its practical applications, especially regarding Forex Trading and understanding global economic indicators.

Core Concept

At its heart, PPP is based on the “law of one price.” This law states that if a good were freely tradable, with no transport costs or barriers to trade, its price should be the same in all countries when expressed in a common currency. Differences in price suggest that the currency of the cheaper country is undervalued, and the currency of the more expensive country is overvalued. PPP extends this idea to a basket of goods and services, rather than a single product, to represent the overall price level in an economy.

Consider this example: A basket of goods costs $100 in the United States and £80 in the United Kingdom. The exchange rate is currently $1.25/£ (meaning it takes $1.25 to buy £1). According to PPP, the exchange rate should be $100/£80 = $1.25/£. If the exchange rate is anything other than this, PPP suggests a misvaluation exists.

Absolute PPP vs. Relative PPP

There are two main forms of PPP:

Absolute PPP*: This is the more straightforward version. It states that the exchange rate between two currencies should equal the ratio of the price levels in the two countries. Mathematically:

  S = P₁ / P₂

  Where:
  * S = Exchange rate (currency 1 per currency 2)
  * P₁ = Price level in country 1
  * P₂ = Price level in country 2

  Absolute PPP rarely holds true in the real world due to factors discussed later. It is useful as a theoretical benchmark.

Relative PPP*: This is a more realistic and commonly used version. It states that the *change* in the exchange rate between two currencies over a period of time should equal the *difference* in the inflation rates in the two countries. Mathematically:

  %ΔS = π₁ - π₂

  Where:
  * %ΔS = Percentage change in the exchange rate
  * π₁ = Inflation rate in country 1
  * π₂ = Inflation rate in country 2

  For example, if inflation in the US is 3% and inflation in the UK is 1%, relative PPP suggests that the dollar should appreciate against the pound by 2%.  This form is more readily testable and has more empirical support than absolute PPP, although deviations are still common. Understanding Inflation is crucial for utilizing Relative PPP.

The Big Mac Index

A popular, informal illustration of PPP is *The Economist*'s Big Mac Index. This index compares the price of a McDonald's Big Mac in different countries. Because the Big Mac is relatively standardized, it serves as a convenient proxy for a basket of goods and services. If a Big Mac costs more in one country than another, the currency of the cheaper country is considered undervalued, and vice-versa. While not a precise measure, the Big Mac Index provides a readily understandable snapshot of potential exchange rate misalignments. It's a fun way to grasp the concept of PPP, but shouldn't be the sole basis for Currency Trading decisions. See also the Swiss Franc as a commonly referenced currency in these comparisons.

Factors Preventing PPP from Holding

Several factors prevent PPP from holding perfectly in the real world:

Transportation Costs*: Moving goods between countries incurs costs (shipping, insurance, tariffs, etc.). These costs create a wedge between the prices of identical goods in different locations.

Trade Barriers*: Tariffs, quotas, and other trade barriers limit the ability of goods to flow freely across borders, preventing price equalization.

Non-Tradable Goods and Services*: Many goods and services are inherently non-tradable, such as haircuts, real estate, and local government services. Prices for these items are determined by local supply and demand and are not subject to the forces of international arbitrage. This is a major reason why absolute PPP fails.

Product Differentiation*: Even seemingly identical goods may differ in quality or brand perception, leading to price differences. A “Big Mac” might not be exactly the same globally.

Capital Controls*: Restrictions on the flow of capital can prevent exchange rates from adjusting to reflect PPP.

Speculation and Market Sentiment*: Exchange rates are heavily influenced by speculation and investor sentiment, which can deviate from fundamental economic factors like PPP. This is a key element of Technical Analysis.

Government Intervention*: Central banks often intervene in foreign exchange markets to influence exchange rates, potentially disrupting PPP.

Time Lags*: Even if PPP holds in the long run, there can be significant time lags before exchange rates adjust to reflect price differentials. This is where concepts like Mean Reversion come into play for traders.

PPP and Exchange Rate Regimes

The extent to which PPP holds can depend on the exchange rate regime a country adopts:

Fixed Exchange Rate Regime*: In a fixed exchange rate regime, a country pegs its currency to another currency or a basket of currencies. This can promote PPP in the short run as the central bank intervenes to maintain the fixed rate. However, it also requires the country to sacrifice monetary policy independence.

Floating Exchange Rate Regime*: In a floating exchange rate regime, the exchange rate is determined by market forces of supply and demand. PPP is more likely to hold in the long run under a floating exchange rate regime, as the exchange rate can adjust to reflect price differentials. However, exchange rates can be volatile in the short run. Understanding Volatility is vital in this context.

Managed Float*: This is a hybrid system where the exchange rate is primarily determined by market forces, but the central bank intervenes occasionally to smooth out fluctuations or prevent excessive volatility.

PPP in Forecasting Exchange Rates

While PPP doesn’t provide a perfect predictor of exchange rates, it can be a useful tool for long-term forecasting. Traders and economists often use PPP as a benchmark to assess whether a currency is overvalued or undervalued.

Undervalued Currency*: If a currency is undervalued according to PPP, it suggests that it is likely to appreciate in the future. Traders might consider buying the currency, anticipating its rise in value.

Overvalued Currency*: Conversely, if a currency is overvalued, it suggests that it is likely to depreciate in the future. Traders might consider selling the currency.

However, it's crucial to remember that PPP is just one factor to consider when forecasting exchange rates. Other important factors include economic growth, interest rates, political stability, and market sentiment. Using PPP in conjunction with Fundamental Analysis and Elliott Wave Theory can improve forecasting accuracy.

PPP and the Balassa-Samuelson Effect

The Balassa-Samuelson effect explains why PPP may not hold perfectly even in the long run, particularly between developed and developing countries. This effect suggests that richer countries tend to have higher price levels for non-tradable goods and services (like healthcare, education, and construction) due to higher wages. Because these goods are not traded internationally, their higher prices contribute to a higher overall price level, and therefore, a stronger currency. This means that even if exchange rates adjust to equalize the prices of tradable goods, the overall price level (and thus the currency) will remain higher in the richer country. Economic Growth plays a significant role in this effect.

Differences Between Nominal and Real Exchange Rates

Nominal Exchange Rate*: This is the exchange rate that you see quoted in the market – the number of units of one currency needed to purchase one unit of another currency.

Real Exchange Rate*: This is the nominal exchange rate adjusted for the price levels in the two countries. It represents the relative purchasing power of the two currencies. The real exchange rate is a more meaningful measure of competitiveness than the nominal exchange rate.

  Real Exchange Rate = Nominal Exchange Rate * (Domestic Price Level / Foreign Price Level)

  If the real exchange rate is above 1, the domestic country’s goods are relatively expensive. If it’s below 1, domestic goods are relatively cheap. Fibonacci Retracements can be used to analyze the real exchange rate trends.

Practical Applications for Traders

Identifying Misvalued Currencies*: PPP helps identify currencies that are potentially mispriced, creating opportunities for profit.

Long-Term Investment Strategies*: PPP is more suited to long-term investment strategies rather than short-term trading.

Hedging Currency Risk*: Understanding PPP can help businesses hedge against currency risk when engaging in international trade.

Analyzing Economic Reports*: PPP provides a framework for interpreting economic reports and understanding the relative economic performance of different countries. Pay attention to GDP figures and their impact on currency valuations.

'Combining with Other Indicators*: Utilize PPP alongside other indicators like MACD, RSI, and Bollinger Bands for a more comprehensive trading strategy.

Limitations and Criticisms

Despite its theoretical appeal, PPP faces significant criticisms:

Empirical Evidence is Mixed*: Empirical studies have found limited support for PPP, especially in the short run.

Assumptions are Unrealistic*: The assumptions underlying PPP (e.g., perfect competition, no transportation costs, no trade barriers) are often unrealistic in the real world.

Difficulty in Measuring Price Levels*: Accurately measuring price levels across countries is challenging due to differences in data collection methods and the composition of consumer baskets.

Focus on Long Run*: PPP is primarily a long-run theory and may not be relevant for short-term trading decisions.

'The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle*: This puzzle points to low international capital mobility, contradicting a key assumption of PPP.

Despite these criticisms, PPP remains a valuable concept for understanding the relationship between exchange rates and price levels. It provides a useful benchmark for evaluating currency valuations and a framework for analyzing international economic trends. Understanding Candlestick Patterns can complement PPP-based analysis.

Further Research

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners