No original research

From binaryoption
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. No Original Research

No original research (often abbreviated as NOR) is a cornerstone policy of Wikipedia, and vitally important for all collaborative knowledge projects built on the MediaWiki platform, including wikis dedicated to finance, trading, and technical analysis. It dictates that articles should primarily summarize and synthesize information *from existing, reliable sources*, rather than presenting new ideas, analyses, or arguments that haven't been published elsewhere. This article will explore the concept of NOR in detail, particularly within the context of a financial trading wiki, explaining what constitutes original research, why it's prohibited, how to avoid it, and how to properly cite sources. It will also address common misconceptions and provide practical examples relevant to traders and analysts.

What is Original Research?

At its core, original research is material that hasn't been previously published in a reputable source. This encompasses a broad range of activities, and understanding its nuances is critical. It's not simply about being the *first* to know something; it's about presenting information that requires readers to rely on *your* interpretation or analysis, rather than established knowledge. Here's a breakdown of what falls under the umbrella of original research:

  • New Interpretations of Data: Taking existing data (e.g., historical price charts, economic indicators) and drawing conclusions that haven’t been published by a reliable source. For example, claiming a specific candlestick pattern *always* leads to a 90% success rate based on your personal backtesting without a published study supporting that claim.
  • New Ideas: Presenting a novel trading strategy or indicator that you've developed without it being documented in a peer-reviewed publication, a respected trading book, or a widely recognized financial news outlet.
  • New Synthesis of Existing Information: Combining established facts in a way that creates a new argument or perspective that hasn't been previously articulated. While *summarizing* information is acceptable, *creating a novel argument* from it is not.
  • Personal Experiences: Sharing your personal trading results or anecdotes as evidence of a strategy's effectiveness. "I used this strategy and made a lot of money" is classic original research.
  • Unverified Claims: Asserting something as fact without providing a reliable source to back it up. This includes statements about market psychology, the effectiveness of specific trading techniques, or the behavior of specific assets.
  • Creating Charts or Graphs to Illustrate New Points: While charts and graphs are helpful, if they are created solely to *prove* a new argument or interpretation, they constitute original research. Charts illustrating *published* research are fine.
  • Predicting Future Events: Attempting to predict future market movements based on your own analysis. While analysis and forecasting are common in finance, a wiki is not the place for personal predictions.

It's crucial to understand that the intent isn't to stifle innovation. The purpose of NOR is to maintain the wiki's role as a repository of *established knowledge*, not a platform for untested theories. Researchers and traders are encouraged to develop new ideas, but those ideas first need to undergo scrutiny and validation through publication in reputable sources.

Why is No Original Research Important?

The prohibition of original research isn’t arbitrary. It’s fundamental to the integrity and reliability of a collaborative knowledge project like a wiki. Here’s why:

  • Verifiability: A core principle of a wiki is that information should be verifiable. If an article relies on original research, there's no independent source to confirm its accuracy. Readers are left relying on the author's word, which undermines the wiki’s credibility.
  • Neutral Point of View: Original research often reflects the author’s personal biases and opinions. This violates the principle of presenting information from a Neutral Point of View. Wikis strive to present a balanced and objective overview of topics.
  • Expertise and Peer Review: Published sources typically undergo a process of peer review or editorial scrutiny, ensuring a level of quality and accuracy. Original research bypasses this crucial step.
  • Maintaining a Secondary Source: A wiki should be a *secondary* source, meaning it summarizes and synthesizes information from primary and secondary sources. It should not *be* a primary source itself. Primary sources are the original materials (research studies, news reports, company filings), while secondary sources analyze and interpret those materials.
  • Legal and Ethical Considerations: In the financial world, providing investment advice or making unsubstantiated claims can have legal and ethical ramifications. A wiki adhering to NOR minimizes these risks.
  • Preventing the Spread of Misinformation: The financial markets are rife with misinformation and speculation. NOR helps prevent a wiki from becoming a vehicle for spreading unverified or misleading information.

How to Avoid Original Research

Avoiding original research requires a conscious effort to focus on summarizing and synthesizing existing knowledge. Here are some practical guidelines:

1. Prioritize Reliable Sources: Use only reputable sources, such as: 

   *   Academic Journals:  Published research in finance, economics, and related fields.  Examples include the *Journal of Finance*, *The Review of Financial Studies*, and *The Journal of Portfolio Management*.
   *   Financial News Outlets:  Established news organizations known for their financial reporting (e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times).
   *   Books by Recognized Experts:  Publications authored by well-respected figures in the trading and investment community.
   *   Government and Regulatory Reports:  Data and analysis from government agencies (e.g., the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission) and regulatory bodies.
   *   Company Filings: Information directly from companies, such as annual reports (10-K), quarterly reports (10-Q), and prospectuses.

2. Attribute Everything: Clearly cite the source for every statement of fact, every interpretation of data, and every idea presented in the article. Use the wiki’s citation tools (usually footnotes) diligently. See Citing Sources for detailed instructions. 3. Summarize, Don't Analyze (Unless Analyzing Published Analysis): Instead of drawing your own conclusions, summarize what existing sources have already concluded. If you're discussing a particular trading strategy, explain how it's described in published sources, rather than offering your own evaluation of its effectiveness. You *can* analyze *published* analysis, explaining different perspectives presented in the literature. 4. Avoid "I" and "We": Avoid using first-person pronouns ("I," "we," "my," "our"). Write in a neutral, objective tone. 5. Focus on Describing, Not Prescribing: Describe trading techniques and indicators, but avoid telling readers how they *should* trade. A wiki should provide information, not investment advice. 6. Be Careful with Examples: Examples can be helpful, but they should be based on published case studies or scenarios. Avoid using your own trading experiences as examples. 7. Back Up Claims with Evidence: Every assertion must be supported by a citation to a reliable source. 8. Recognize the Difference Between Reporting and Analysis: Reporting states what happened; analysis explains why it happened. Focus on reporting what sources have said, rather than offering your own analysis.

Common Misconceptions about No Original Research

Several common misconceptions can lead to unintentional violations of the NOR policy. Here are a few:

  • "It's Common Knowledge": Just because something is widely believed doesn't mean it's not original research. If it's not supported by a reliable source, it shouldn't be included.
  • "I'm Just Sharing My Expertise": While your expertise is valuable, a wiki isn't the appropriate venue for sharing it directly. Your expertise can be used to *find* and *summarize* reliable sources, but not to present your own original ideas.
  • "It's a Simple Deduction": Even if a conclusion seems logically obvious, it's still original research if it hasn’t been stated in a reliable source.
  • "I'm Combining Existing Ideas in a New Way": While synthesizing information is acceptable, creating a new argument or perspective from that synthesis is not.
  • "It Doesn't Matter Because It's Just a Wiki": The principles of NOR are essential for maintaining the credibility and reliability of *any* collaborative knowledge project, including wikis.

Examples in a Financial Trading Context

Let's illustrate the principles of NOR with some examples relevant to a financial trading wiki:

    • Original Research (Not Allowed):**
  • "Based on my backtesting, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is most effective when used with a setting of 14 and a signal line at 70/30." (This is a personal finding that needs to be supported by a published study.)
  • "I've developed a new candlestick pattern that I call the 'Phoenix Reversal,' which consistently signals trend reversals." (This is a novel idea that hasn't been validated.)
  • "The market is irrationally optimistic right now, and a correction is imminent." (This is a personal prediction.)
  • "Fibonacci retracements are universally effective because of the golden ratio’s inherent mathematical properties." (While the golden ratio is a mathematical concept, claiming universal effectiveness requires citation to published financial analysis.)
    • Acceptable (Following NOR):**
  • "According to Murphy (1999), the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a momentum oscillator used to identify overbought and oversold conditions." (This summarizes information from a published source.)
  • "Elder (1993) describes the 'Phoenix Reversal' as a three-candlestick pattern that suggests a potential trend reversal, though its reliability is debated among traders." (This reports on a published description and acknowledges differing opinions.)
  • "Bloomberg reported on January 26, 2024, that market sentiment is currently high following a series of positive economic reports." (This reports on a news event.)
  • “Fibonacci retracement levels are commonly used by traders to identify potential support and resistance levels, as detailed in Frost (1995).” (This explains a common practice supported by a source.)

Resources and Further Reading

Related Topics

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=No_original_research&oldid=46637"