Burden of proof

1. Burden of Proof

The **burden of proof** is a critical concept in any legal or adjudicative system, and understanding it is particularly important for traders engaging in binary options trading, especially when disputes arise with brokers. While typically associated with courtrooms, the principles directly translate to resolving claims and understanding contractual obligations within the financial markets. This article will provide a comprehensive explanation of the burden of proof, its types, how it applies to binary options, and the implications for traders.

What is the Burden of Proof?

At its core, the burden of proof refers to the obligation placed on a party in a legal proceeding (or, as we'll see, a dispute resolution process) to demonstrate the truth of their assertions. It’s not simply enough to *claim* something; you must present evidence sufficient to convince the decision-maker (judge, arbitrator, or broker’s internal review team) that your claim is more likely true than not. The party with the burden of proof bears the risk of losing if they fail to meet this standard.

Think of it like a scale. Initially, the scale is balanced. The party bearing the burden of proof must add enough "weight" (evidence) to their side of the scale to tip it in their favor. If they fail to do so, the opposing party prevails.

Types of Burden of Proof

There are different *standards* of burden of proof, varying based on the type of case and the potential consequences. These standards dictate how much evidence is required to meet the burden. The most common are:

**Beyond a Reasonable Doubt:** This is the highest standard, used in criminal cases. The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt to such a degree that no reasonable person would doubt it. This is *not* applicable to binary options disputes.
**Clear and Convincing Evidence:** This standard is higher than a preponderance of the evidence but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt. It requires the party with the burden to demonstrate that the truth of their facts is highly probable. This might be used in specific civil cases involving fraud, but is uncommon in typical binary options claims.
**Preponderance of the Evidence:** This is the most common standard in civil cases, including many contract disputes relevant to binary options trading. It means that it is "more likely than not" that the fact in question is true. Essentially, 51% certainty is sufficient. This is the standard most frequently encountered in resolving disputes with binary options brokers.
**Burden of Production:** This is a lesser burden, requiring a party to present *some* evidence to support their claim. It doesn't necessarily mean the evidence is conclusive, but it's enough to avoid an immediate dismissal of the claim. Once the burden of production is met, the burden of proof shifts.

The Burden of Proof in Binary Options Trading

In the context of binary options, the burden of proof typically falls on the trader when challenging a broker’s decision. This arises in several scenarios:

**Disputed Payouts:** If a trader believes a payout was incorrectly calculated or not honored, they have the burden of proving the outcome should have been different. This requires presenting evidence such as screenshots of the trade details (strike price, expiry time, asset price at expiry), trade history records, and any communication with the broker. Understanding technical analysis at the time of the trade can be crucial here.
**Account Restrictions/Closures:** If a broker restricts or closes a trader’s account, the trader bears the burden of proving the action was unjustified based on the broker’s terms and conditions. This might involve demonstrating compliance with the broker’s rules regarding trading strategies (e.g., avoiding martingale strategy if prohibited) and account funding.
**Broker Misconduct:** If a trader alleges fraudulent activity by the broker (e.g., price manipulation, delayed execution), they must provide evidence supporting these claims. This is a higher burden, potentially requiring expert testimony or documentation of systemic issues.
**Contractual Disputes:** All disputes are ultimately governed by the contractual agreement between the trader and the broker. The trader must understand the terms and conditions and prove any breach of contract by the broker.

Shifting the Burden of Proof

While the initial burden usually rests with the trader, it can *shift* under certain circumstances. For example:

**Broker’s Affirmative Defense:** If the broker raises an affirmative defense (e.g., claiming the trader violated the terms and conditions), *they* then bear the burden of proving that defense.
**Presumptions:** Legal presumptions can also shift the burden. For instance, a presumption of innocence in criminal law means the prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt. In binary options, a presumption might relate to the accuracy of the broker’s trade execution records (though this is often heavily debated).
**Evidence Presented:** If the trader presents compelling evidence, the broker might be required to provide evidence to rebut it, effectively shifting the burden to them for that specific issue.

Evidence in Binary Options Disputes

What constitutes acceptable evidence in a binary options dispute?

**Screenshots:** Critical for capturing trade details, account balances, and communication with the broker. Ensure screenshots are time-stamped and unaltered.
**Trade History:** Downloadable trade history records from the broker’s platform.
**Broker’s Terms and Conditions:** A copy of the agreement with the broker, highlighting relevant clauses.
**Communication Records:** Emails, chat logs, and phone call records with the broker.
**Independent Price Data:** Data from reputable financial data providers (e.g., Reuters, Bloomberg) to verify asset prices at expiry. This is especially important when questioning a broker’s reported price. Understanding trading volume analysis can corroborate price movements.
**Expert Testimony:** In complex cases, an expert in financial markets or binary options trading might be needed to provide an opinion.
**Transaction Records:** Proof of deposits and withdrawals.
**Platform Logs:** If available, logs from the trading platform itself can provide valuable evidence.

Strategies to Strengthen Your Case

Given the burden of proof, traders should proactively take steps to strengthen their position:

**Document Everything:** Keep meticulous records of all trades, communications, and account activity.
**Read the Terms and Conditions:** Thoroughly understand the broker’s rules *before* trading.
**Use Reputable Brokers:** Choose brokers regulated by recognized authorities. CySEC regulated brokers generally offer more recourse.
**Understand Risk Management:** Implement sound risk management strategies to avoid account restrictions or closures.
**Take Screenshots Regularly:** Capture screenshots of trades *immediately* after they expire.
**Verify Asset Prices:** Cross-reference the broker’s reported price with independent sources.
**Consider Third-Party Dispute Resolution:** Many brokers offer access to independent dispute resolution services.
**Be Aware of expiration time impact:** Understand how the expiration time impacts your trade outcome.
**Utilize support and resistance levels**: Knowing key levels can help prove trade validity.
**Understand moving average convergence divergence (MACD)**: Utilizing this indicator in your evidence can strengthen your case.
**Analyze Bollinger Bands**: Demonstrating your trading strategy based on this indicator can add weight to your claims.
**Consider Fibonacci retracement levels**: Using Fibonacci levels in your trading strategy can aid in justifying trade decisions.
**Be familiar with Japanese Candlesticks**: Understanding candlestick patterns can help explain your trading rationale.
**Explore High-Low options strategies**: If you utilized this option, present your strategy and analysis.

Dispute Resolution Processes

When a dispute arises, several avenues exist for resolution:

**Direct Negotiation with the Broker:** The first step should always be to attempt to resolve the issue directly with the broker’s customer support team.
**Broker’s Internal Complaint Procedure:** Most brokers have a formal complaint procedure outlined in their terms and conditions.
**Independent Dispute Resolution:** Services like The Financial Commission offer mediation and arbitration for binary options disputes.
**Chargeback (with caution):** While a chargeback through your credit card company is an option, it can be problematic and potentially violate the broker’s terms and conditions.
**Legal Action:** As a last resort, you may consider pursuing legal action, but this can be expensive and time-consuming.

Conclusion

The burden of proof is a fundamental principle that governs dispute resolution in binary options trading. Traders must understand their obligations, gather comprehensive evidence, and proactively protect their rights. By documenting everything, understanding the broker’s terms and conditions, and utilizing sound trading strategies, traders can significantly increase their chances of successfully resolving disputes and protecting their investments. A solid understanding of the burden of proof, coupled with diligent record-keeping, is essential for navigating the complexities of the binary options market.

Start Trading Now

Register with IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account with Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to get: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners