ADRs

From binaryoption
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) are a lightweight documentation approach for capturing significant architectural decisions made during the development of a software system. They serve as a historical record of the rationale behind design choices, aiding future developers in understanding the 'why' behind the 'what' of the system's architecture. This article will provide a comprehensive overview of ADRs, their benefits, format, process, and best practices, tailored for beginners.

What are ADRs and Why Use Them?

In software development, especially in complex projects, numerous decisions need to be made concerning the system's architecture. These decisions range from choosing a particular database to selecting a specific communication protocol. While code itself reflects *what* was built, it often doesn’t explain *why* certain choices were made. This context is crucial for maintainability, onboarding new team members, and avoiding repeating past mistakes.

ADRs address this problem by providing a structured way to document these architectural decisions. They aren’t just about recording the final choice; they document the considered options, the pros and cons of each, and the reasoning behind the selected approach.

Here’s a breakdown of the benefits:

  • Improved Communication: ADRs facilitate clear communication among team members, stakeholders, and future developers. They provide a common understanding of the architectural rationale.
  • Reduced Cognitive Load: By documenting decisions, ADRs reduce the burden on individual developers to remember past discussions and justifications.
  • Enhanced Maintainability: Understanding the context behind architectural choices makes it easier to modify and extend the system without introducing unintended consequences. This ties into concepts like Technical Debt.
  • Faster Onboarding: New team members can quickly grasp the system's architecture by reviewing the ADRs, accelerating their contribution.
  • Auditing and Compliance: ADRs can be useful for auditing purposes, demonstrating that architectural decisions were well-considered and documented, particularly important in regulated industries.
  • Avoidance of Reinventing the Wheel: ADRs prevent teams from repeatedly debating and re-evaluating the same architectural choices. They provide a record of what was already considered and why.
  • Support for Evolutionary Architecture: ADRs promote an evolutionary architecture, where the system can adapt and evolve over time based on changing requirements and learnings.

ADR Format

While there’s no strict standard, a common and effective ADR format includes the following sections:

1. Title: A concise and descriptive title that clearly identifies the decision. Use a consistent naming convention (e.g., `0001-use-relational-database`). The numerical prefix ensures chronological ordering. 2. Status: Indicates the current state of the ADR: 

   *   Proposed: The decision is under consideration.
   *   Accepted: The decision has been approved and is being implemented.
   *   Rejected: The decision was considered but ultimately discarded.
   *   Superseded: The decision has been replaced by a newer ADR.

3. Context: Describes the problem or situation that requires a decision. Explain the background and the driving forces behind the need for a choice. This should clearly articulate the *why* behind the ADR. 4. Decision: Clearly states the chosen architectural solution. This should be a concise and unambiguous statement. 5. Consequences: Details the positive and negative consequences of the decision. This includes: 

   *   Positive Consequences: Benefits of the chosen solution.
   *   Negative Consequences: Drawbacks or trade-offs of the chosen solution.  Be honest about potential challenges.

6. Alternatives Considered: Lists the alternative solutions that were evaluated, along with a brief explanation of why they were not chosen. 7. References: Links to relevant documentation, discussions, or external resources. This could include links to Design Patterns, specific technologies, or related ADRs.

Example ADR (Simplified):

``` Title: 0001-use-relational-database Status: Accepted Context: We need to choose a database for storing user data and application state. The application requires strong data consistency and support for complex queries. Decision: We will use PostgreSQL as our relational database. Consequences: 

   Positive Consequences: PostgreSQL is a mature, reliable, and feature-rich database with excellent support for ACID transactions and complex queries. It has a large community and extensive documentation.
   Negative Consequences: PostgreSQL can be more complex to set up and manage than simpler NoSQL databases.

Alternatives Considered: 

   *   MongoDB: Rejected due to concerns about data consistency and the lack of strong schema enforcement.
   *   MySQL: Rejected due to limitations in advanced features compared to PostgreSQL.

References: 

   *   PostgreSQL Documentation
   *   MongoDB Documentation

```

The ADR Process

Implementing ADRs effectively requires a defined process. Here's a suggested workflow:

1. Initiate an ADR: When an architectural decision needs to be made, a developer or architect creates a new ADR document (typically a Markdown file). 2. Proposed Status: The ADR is initially created with a "Proposed" status, outlining the context and potential alternatives. 3. Discussion and Review: The ADR is shared with the team for discussion and review. This can happen during architectural meetings, code reviews, or through dedicated ADR review sessions. Encourage diverse perspectives. 4. Decision and Acceptance: Based on the discussion, a decision is made, and the ADR is updated with the chosen solution and its consequences. The status is changed to "Accepted." This often requires a formal sign-off from key stakeholders. 5. Implementation: The chosen solution is implemented in the codebase. 6. Documentation and Version Control: ADRs are stored alongside the codebase in a version control system (e.g., Git). This ensures that they are tracked and versioned along with the code. 7. Superseding ADRs: If a decision is later revised or replaced, a new ADR is created, and the original ADR is marked as "Superseded," with a reference to the new ADR.

Tools and Technologies

Several tools can help manage ADRs. Some popular options include:

  • adr-tools: A command-line tool specifically designed for managing ADRs. It handles creating, listing, and linking ADRs. [1]
  • ADR Template (VS Code Extension): A Visual Studio Code extension that provides templates and utilities for working with ADRs. [2]
  • Git: The core version control system for storing and tracking ADRs.
  • Markdown Editors: Any text editor that supports Markdown can be used to create and edit ADRs.

Best Practices

  • Keep ADRs Concise: ADRs should be focused and to the point. Avoid unnecessary detail.
  • Use a Consistent Naming Convention: This makes it easier to find and organize ADRs.
  • Write ADRs Early: Document architectural decisions as they are made, not after the fact.
  • Encourage Participation: Involve the entire team in the ADR process.
  • Treat ADRs as Living Documents: ADRs should be updated and revised as the system evolves.
  • Regularly Review ADRs: Periodically review ADRs to ensure they are still relevant and accurate.
  • Link ADRs: Connect related ADRs to create a network of architectural knowledge. Utilize internal links like Dependency Management.
  • Don't Over-Document: Focus on *significant* architectural decisions. Not every minor choice requires an ADR. Prioritize decisions with long-term implications.
  • Focus on Rationale: The most important part of an ADR is the explanation of *why* a decision was made.

ADRs and Agile Development

ADRs integrate well with Agile development methodologies. They provide a lightweight and iterative way to document architectural decisions as they emerge during sprints. They complement practices like Refactoring and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD). The iterative nature of ADRs allows for adjustments based on feedback and changing requirements.

Common Architectural Considerations for ADRs

Here are some common areas where ADRs are particularly useful:

  • Database Selection: Choosing between relational databases (like PostgreSQL, MySQL), NoSQL databases (like MongoDB, Cassandra), or other data storage solutions.
  • API Design: Selecting an API style (REST, GraphQL, gRPC) and defining API contracts.
  • Microservices Architecture: Defining the boundaries of microservices and the communication mechanisms between them.
  • Caching Strategies: Choosing a caching solution (Redis, Memcached) and defining caching policies.
  • Security Considerations: Deciding on authentication and authorization mechanisms.
  • Deployment Strategies: Selecting a deployment approach (blue-green deployments, canary releases).
  • Technology Stack: Choosing programming languages, frameworks, and libraries.
  • Event Handling: Implementing event-driven architectures and message queues (RabbitMQ, Kafka).
  • Testing Strategies: Defining the types of tests (unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests) and testing frameworks to use.
  • Monitoring and Logging: Selecting monitoring tools (Prometheus, Grafana) and logging frameworks.

Resources and Further Learning

  • Architecture Decision Records (Michael Nygard): [3] - The original article that popularized ADRs.
  • adr-tools GitHub Repository: [4]
  • Martin Fowler - Evolutionary Architecture: [5]
  • Refactoring.Guru: [6] - A website with information about design patterns and refactoring techniques.
  • SOLID Principles: [7] - A set of principles for designing maintainable and extensible software.
  • Domain-Driven Design (DDD): [8] - A software development approach that focuses on modeling the business domain.
  • Microservices Pattern: [9] - An article describing the microservices architectural style.
  • Twelve-Factor App: [10] - A set of best practices for building scalable and maintainable web applications.
  • Continuous Integration: [11]
  • Continuous Delivery: [12]
  • Technical Debt Quadrants: [13]
  • Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software: [14]
  • Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship: [15]
  • The Pragmatic Programmer: Your Journey To Mastery: [16]
  • Software Architecture in Practice (Bass, Clements, Kazman): [17]
  • Building Microservices (Sam Newman): [18]
  • Release It!: Design and Deploy Production-Ready Software (Michael T. Nygard): [19]
  • Site Reliability Engineering: How Google Runs Production Systems: [20]
  • Understanding Distributed Systems: [21]
  • Database Normalization: [22]
  • CAP Theorem: [23]
  • Event Sourcing: [24]
  • CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation): [25]
  • RESTful API Design: [26]
  • GraphQL: [27]



Technical Debt Design Patterns Microservices Continuous Integration Refactoring API Design Database Selection Testing Strategies Monitoring and Logging Dependency Management

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=ADRs&oldid=35120"