Template:Uses Academic citation

From binaryoption
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. Template:Uses Academic citation

Template:Uses Academic citation is a crucial meta-template within MediaWiki, specifically designed to flag articles that extensively and appropriately utilize academic citations to support their content. This template isn’t about *creating* citations (that’s handled by templates like Template:Cite book or Template:Cite journal), but rather about *indicating* that an article adheres to a high standard of academic rigor through consistent and proper citation practices. This article will comprehensively cover the purpose, usage, categorization, and best practices for employing this template. It’s intended for both novice and intermediate MediaWiki editors aiming to improve the quality and credibility of articles.

Purpose and Importance

The primary purpose of `Template:Uses Academic citation` is to identify articles that demonstrate a commitment to verifiable, evidence-based information. In an environment where misinformation can proliferate, clearly marking articles that rely on scholarly sources is vital. This serves several important functions:

  • **Signal of Quality:** The template acts as a visual cue to readers, indicating that the article’s claims are supported by reputable academic research. This instills confidence in the information presented.
  • **Editorial Oversight:** It helps editors quickly identify articles that have already undergone a degree of source verification, streamlining the editing and review process. Editors can focus their efforts on articles lacking this flag, prioritizing improvements where they are most needed.
  • **Categorization and Search:** The template allows for the categorization of articles based on their adherence to academic standards, making it easier for users to find well-sourced content. This is particularly useful in projects focused on educational or research-intensive topics.
  • **Encouragement of Best Practices:** The presence of this template encourages other editors to emulate the citation practices found in flagged articles, promoting a culture of academic rigor throughout the wiki.
  • **Distinction from Other Sources:** It differentiates articles relying on peer-reviewed academic sources from those primarily utilizing news reports, blogs, or other less formal sources. This distinction is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the wiki's information.

When to Use the Template

Applying `Template:Uses Academic citation` requires careful consideration. It should *not* be used lightly. Here are the criteria an article must meet before the template is appropriate:

  • **Dominant Use of Academic Sources:** The vast majority of claims within the article (generally, over 75%) must be directly supported by citations to peer-reviewed academic journals, scholarly books, or reputable academic databases. Sources like Wikipedia:Reliable sources should be consulted for defining "reputable."
  • **Proper Citation Formatting:** All citations must adhere to a consistent citation style (e.g., MLA, APA, Chicago). Using templates like Template:Cite book, Template:Cite journal, and Template:Cite web is *strongly* recommended to ensure consistency and accuracy. Inconsistent or poorly formatted citations disqualify an article from being tagged with this template. Consider using tools like Help:Citation tools to assist with formatting.
  • **Avoidance of Primary Sources as Sole Support:** While primary sources (e.g., original research papers) can be used, they should not be the sole basis for significant claims. Secondary sources (e.g., reviews, analyses) that interpret and synthesize primary research are essential. The balance between primary and secondary sources should lean heavily towards the latter.
  • **No Original Research:** The article must not present any original research or analysis not already published in academic sources. The purpose is to *summarize* existing knowledge, not to create new knowledge within the wiki itself. This aligns with the core principle of Wikipedia:No original research.
  • **Comprehensive Coverage:** The article should demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic, drawing on a variety of academic sources to present a nuanced and balanced perspective. Avoid relying on a single source or a limited number of sources.
  • **Neutral Point of View (NPOV):** The article must adhere to a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and present information in an objective and unbiased manner. Academic sources should be chosen and presented in a way that reflects the full range of perspectives on the topic.

How to Use the Template

Using the template is straightforward. Simply add the following code to the top of the article's talk page:

```wiki

  1. Template:Uses Academic citation

Template:Uses Academic citation is a crucial meta-template within MediaWiki, specifically designed to flag articles that extensively and appropriately utilize academic citations to support their content. This template isn’t about *creating* citations (that’s handled by templates like Template:Cite book or Template:Cite journal), but rather about *indicating* that an article adheres to a high standard of academic rigor through consistent and proper citation practices. This article will comprehensively cover the purpose, usage, categorization, and best practices for employing this template. It’s intended for both novice and intermediate MediaWiki editors aiming to improve the quality and credibility of articles.

Purpose and Importance

The primary purpose of `Template:Uses Academic citation` is to identify articles that demonstrate a commitment to verifiable, evidence-based information. In an environment where misinformation can proliferate, clearly marking articles that rely on scholarly sources is vital. This serves several important functions:

  • **Signal of Quality:** The template acts as a visual cue to readers, indicating that the article’s claims are supported by reputable academic research. This instills confidence in the information presented.
  • **Editorial Oversight:** It helps editors quickly identify articles that have already undergone a degree of source verification, streamlining the editing and review process. Editors can focus their efforts on articles lacking this flag, prioritizing improvements where they are most needed.
  • **Categorization and Search:** The template allows for the categorization of articles based on their adherence to academic standards, making it easier for users to find well-sourced content. This is particularly useful in projects focused on educational or research-intensive topics.
  • **Encouragement of Best Practices:** The presence of this template encourages other editors to emulate the citation practices found in flagged articles, promoting a culture of academic rigor throughout the wiki.
  • **Distinction from Other Sources:** It differentiates articles relying on peer-reviewed academic sources from those primarily utilizing news reports, blogs, or other less formal sources. This distinction is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the wiki's information.

When to Use the Template

Applying `Template:Uses Academic citation` requires careful consideration. It should *not* be used lightly. Here are the criteria an article must meet before the template is appropriate:

  • **Dominant Use of Academic Sources:** The vast majority of claims within the article (generally, over 75%) must be directly supported by citations to peer-reviewed academic journals, scholarly books, or reputable academic databases. Sources like Wikipedia:Reliable sources should be consulted for defining "reputable."
  • **Proper Citation Formatting:** All citations must adhere to a consistent citation style (e.g., MLA, APA, Chicago). Using templates like Template:Cite book, Template:Cite journal, and Template:Cite web is *strongly* recommended to ensure consistency and accuracy. Inconsistent or poorly formatted citations disqualify an article from being tagged with this template. Consider using tools like Help:Citation tools to assist with formatting.
  • **Avoidance of Primary Sources as Sole Support:** While primary sources (e.g., original research papers) can be used, they should not be the sole basis for significant claims. Secondary sources (e.g., reviews, analyses) that interpret and synthesize primary research are essential. The balance between primary and secondary sources should lean heavily towards the latter.
  • **No Original Research:** The article must not present any original research or analysis not already published in academic sources. The purpose is to *summarize* existing knowledge, not to create new knowledge within the wiki itself. This aligns with the core principle of Wikipedia:No original research.
  • **Comprehensive Coverage:** The article should demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic, drawing on a variety of academic sources to present a nuanced and balanced perspective. Avoid relying on a single source or a limited number of sources.
  • **Neutral Point of View (NPOV):** The article must adhere to a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and present information in an objective and unbiased manner. Academic sources should be chosen and presented in a way that reflects the full range of perspectives on the topic.

How to Use the Template

Using the template is straightforward. Simply add the following code to the top of the article's talk page:

```wiki Template loop detected: Template:Uses Academic citation ```

That's it! The template will automatically add a banner to the article's talk page indicating that it utilizes academic citations. No parameters are currently required for this template. However, future updates may introduce parameters for specifying the citation style or other relevant information.

Categorization

The `Template:Uses Academic citation` automatically categorizes the article into the following category:

This category allows users to easily find articles that meet the criteria outlined above. It also facilitates editorial oversight and quality control. Further subcategorization might be considered in the future based on specific academic disciplines or citation styles.

Maintenance and Review

Applying the template is not a one-time action. It requires ongoing maintenance and review.

  • **Regular Audits:** Editors should periodically review articles tagged with this template to ensure they continue to meet the criteria. New information may become available, or sources may become outdated.
  • **Addressing Citation Drift:** Over time, edits may introduce claims that are not adequately supported by academic sources. Editors should promptly address any instances of "citation drift" and either add appropriate citations or remove the unsupported claims.
  • **Responding to Disputes:** If a user disputes the application of the template, a discussion should be initiated on the article's talk page. The dispute should be resolved through consensus based on the criteria outlined in this article.
  • **Monitoring for Source Quality:** Be vigilant about the quality of sources used. Predatory journals and questionable academic publications should be avoided. Consult resource lists like Wikipedia:Identifying and using reliable sources for guidance.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • **Over-reliance on textbooks:** While textbooks can be useful, they are often considered secondary sources and should not be the primary basis for claims. Focus on peer-reviewed research articles and scholarly books.
  • **Using Wikipedia as a source:** Wikipedia is a tertiary source and should never be cited directly in articles. Use the sources cited *within* Wikipedia as a starting point for your own research.
  • **Ignoring citation style guidelines:** Inconsistent citation formatting undermines the credibility of the article. Adhere to a consistent style and use citation templates to ensure accuracy.
  • **Adding the template prematurely:** Don't add the template until the article *fully* meets the criteria outlined above. It's better to err on the side of caution.
  • **Failing to review updates:** Regularly review articles tagged with the template to ensure they continue to meet the criteria.

Relationship to Other Templates and Guidelines

This template works in conjunction with several other templates and guidelines:

Advanced Considerations

  • **Discipline-Specific Citation Styles:** Different academic disciplines may have different preferred citation styles. Consider specifying the citation style used in the article on the talk page (e.g., "This article uses APA 7th edition style.").
  • **Long-Term Stability of Sources:** Prioritize sources that are likely to remain accessible and stable over time. Avoid citing sources that are behind paywalls or that are likely to disappear from the web.
  • **Use of DOI (Digital Object Identifier):** Whenever possible, include the DOI in citations to journal articles. DOIs provide a persistent link to the article, even if the URL changes.
  • **Archiving Web Sources:** If citing web sources, consider archiving them using services like the Wayback Machine to ensure they remain accessible even if the original website is removed.
  • **Addressing Conflicting Sources:** If academic sources present conflicting information, acknowledge the discrepancies and present both sides of the argument fairly. Avoid taking a position unless there is a clear consensus in the academic literature.

Technical Details

The template is a simple meta-template written in wiki markup. It currently does not have any parameters and relies solely on its presence on the talk page to indicate that the article meets the criteria for academic citation. The template's code is relatively straightforward and can be modified by experienced MediaWiki administrators if necessary. The template utilises the category system effectively to organise and present articles. The template is designed to complement existing citation templates and guidelines, rather than replacing them. It's important to understand the interplay between these different elements to ensure the quality and credibility of articles.

Strategies, Technical Analysis, Indicators, and Trends (Links)

Here are 25 links relating to strategies, technical analysis, indicators, and trends, for illustrative purposes (these are not directly related to the template functionality itself, but are included as requested):

1. Moving Average 2. Relative Strength Index 3. MACD 4. Bollinger Bands 5. Fibonacci Retracement 6. Candlestick Patterns 7. Support and Resistance 8. Trend Lines 9. Chart Patterns 10. Elliott Wave Theory 11. Day Trading Strategies 12. Swing Trading Strategies 13. Position Trading Strategies 14. Scalping Strategies 15. Risk Management 16. Technical Indicators 17. Fundamental Analysis 18. Market Sentiment 19. Economic Indicators 20. Forex Trading 21. Stock Market Analysis 22. Cryptocurrency Trading 23. Options Trading 24. Trend Following 25. Mean Reversion

Conclusion

`Template:Uses Academic citation` is a valuable tool for identifying and promoting high-quality, well-sourced articles within MediaWiki. By adhering to the criteria outlined above and engaging in ongoing maintenance and review, editors can ensure that this template continues to serve its purpose: to signal to readers that an article is based on sound academic research and represents a reliable source of information. It’s a small step with a significant impact on the overall quality and credibility of the wiki.

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners ```

That's it! The template will automatically add a banner to the article's talk page indicating that it utilizes academic citations. No parameters are currently required for this template. However, future updates may introduce parameters for specifying the citation style or other relevant information.

Categorization

The `Template:Uses Academic citation` automatically categorizes the article into the following category:

This category allows users to easily find articles that meet the criteria outlined above. It also facilitates editorial oversight and quality control. Further subcategorization might be considered in the future based on specific academic disciplines or citation styles.

Maintenance and Review

Applying the template is not a one-time action. It requires ongoing maintenance and review.

  • **Regular Audits:** Editors should periodically review articles tagged with this template to ensure they continue to meet the criteria. New information may become available, or sources may become outdated.
  • **Addressing Citation Drift:** Over time, edits may introduce claims that are not adequately supported by academic sources. Editors should promptly address any instances of "citation drift" and either add appropriate citations or remove the unsupported claims.
  • **Responding to Disputes:** If a user disputes the application of the template, a discussion should be initiated on the article's talk page. The dispute should be resolved through consensus based on the criteria outlined in this article.
  • **Monitoring for Source Quality:** Be vigilant about the quality of sources used. Predatory journals and questionable academic publications should be avoided. Consult resource lists like Wikipedia:Identifying and using reliable sources for guidance.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • **Over-reliance on textbooks:** While textbooks can be useful, they are often considered secondary sources and should not be the primary basis for claims. Focus on peer-reviewed research articles and scholarly books.
  • **Using Wikipedia as a source:** Wikipedia is a tertiary source and should never be cited directly in articles. Use the sources cited *within* Wikipedia as a starting point for your own research.
  • **Ignoring citation style guidelines:** Inconsistent citation formatting undermines the credibility of the article. Adhere to a consistent style and use citation templates to ensure accuracy.
  • **Adding the template prematurely:** Don't add the template until the article *fully* meets the criteria outlined above. It's better to err on the side of caution.
  • **Failing to review updates:** Regularly review articles tagged with the template to ensure they continue to meet the criteria.

Relationship to Other Templates and Guidelines

This template works in conjunction with several other templates and guidelines:

Advanced Considerations

  • **Discipline-Specific Citation Styles:** Different academic disciplines may have different preferred citation styles. Consider specifying the citation style used in the article on the talk page (e.g., "This article uses APA 7th edition style.").
  • **Long-Term Stability of Sources:** Prioritize sources that are likely to remain accessible and stable over time. Avoid citing sources that are behind paywalls or that are likely to disappear from the web.
  • **Use of DOI (Digital Object Identifier):** Whenever possible, include the DOI in citations to journal articles. DOIs provide a persistent link to the article, even if the URL changes.
  • **Archiving Web Sources:** If citing web sources, consider archiving them using services like the Wayback Machine to ensure they remain accessible even if the original website is removed.
  • **Addressing Conflicting Sources:** If academic sources present conflicting information, acknowledge the discrepancies and present both sides of the argument fairly. Avoid taking a position unless there is a clear consensus in the academic literature.

Technical Details

The template is a simple meta-template written in wiki markup. It currently does not have any parameters and relies solely on its presence on the talk page to indicate that the article meets the criteria for academic citation. The template's code is relatively straightforward and can be modified by experienced MediaWiki administrators if necessary. The template utilises the category system effectively to organise and present articles. The template is designed to complement existing citation templates and guidelines, rather than replacing them. It's important to understand the interplay between these different elements to ensure the quality and credibility of articles.

Strategies, Technical Analysis, Indicators, and Trends (Links)

Here are 25 links relating to strategies, technical analysis, indicators, and trends, for illustrative purposes (these are not directly related to the template functionality itself, but are included as requested):

1. Moving Average 2. Relative Strength Index 3. MACD 4. Bollinger Bands 5. Fibonacci Retracement 6. Candlestick Patterns 7. Support and Resistance 8. Trend Lines 9. Chart Patterns 10. Elliott Wave Theory 11. Day Trading Strategies 12. Swing Trading Strategies 13. Position Trading Strategies 14. Scalping Strategies 15. Risk Management 16. Technical Indicators 17. Fundamental Analysis 18. Market Sentiment 19. Economic Indicators 20. Forex Trading 21. Stock Market Analysis 22. Cryptocurrency Trading 23. Options Trading 24. Trend Following 25. Mean Reversion

Conclusion

`Template:Uses Academic citation` is a valuable tool for identifying and promoting high-quality, well-sourced articles within MediaWiki. By adhering to the criteria outlined above and engaging in ongoing maintenance and review, editors can ensure that this template continues to serve its purpose: to signal to readers that an article is based on sound academic research and represents a reliable source of information. It’s a small step with a significant impact on the overall quality and credibility of the wiki.

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=Template:Uses_Academic_citation&oldid=51831"