Polling (computer science)

From binaryoption
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. Polling (computer science)

Polling is a fundamental concept in computer science, particularly in the realms of operating systems, embedded systems, and input/output (I/O) management. It refers to a systematic method of checking the status of an external device or peripheral to see if it is ready for communication or has completed an operation. While seemingly simple, polling is a core technique with significant implications for system performance, resource utilization, and real-time responsiveness. This article provides a comprehensive overview of polling, its mechanisms, advantages, disadvantages, variations, and its comparison to alternative approaches like interrupts.

Core Concepts

At its heart, polling involves the CPU repeatedly querying a device to determine its status. This query typically involves reading a status register associated with the device. The status register contains bits indicating whether the device is busy, ready for data, or has encountered an error. The CPU doesn’t wait passively for the device to signal completion; it actively asks.

Consider a keyboard, for example. When a key is pressed, the keyboard controller doesn’t immediately notify the CPU. Instead, the CPU periodically *polls* the keyboard controller by reading its status register. If the status register indicates that a key has been pressed, the CPU then reads the key code from another register within the keyboard controller. If no key has been pressed, the CPU moves on to other tasks and repeats the polling process later.

This process is a loop. A simplified pseudo-code representation of polling looks like this:

``` while (true) { 

 check_keyboard_status();
 if (key_pressed) {
   read_key_code();
   process_key_code();
 } else {
   // Do other tasks
 }
 delay(some_time_interval); // Prevent CPU hogging

} ```

The `delay()` function is crucial. Without it, the CPU would spend all its time checking the keyboard, potentially freezing the system. The optimal `delay` value is a trade-off: too long a delay introduces latency, while too short a delay consumes excessive CPU cycles.

Types of Polling

Several variations of polling exist, each optimized for different scenarios:

  • Busy-Waiting (Spin Polling): This is the simplest form of polling. The CPU continuously checks the device status in a tight loop, consuming 100% CPU time during the polling process. It's efficient only when the expected wait time is extremely short. It is generally avoided in general-purpose operating systems due to its inefficiency. However, it can be useful in real-time systems where predictability is paramount, even at the cost of CPU usage. Real-time operating systems sometimes use spin locks, a related concept.
  • Rate-Controlled Polling (Periodic Polling): This method introduces a delay between polls, as illustrated in the pseudo-code above. It reduces CPU usage compared to busy-waiting, but introduces latency proportional to the polling interval. The polling interval must be carefully chosen based on the application’s requirements. This is the most common form of polling in many systems. System calls often involve polling under the hood.
  • Demand Polling (Selective Polling): In this approach, the CPU polls devices only when a specific event triggers the need for polling. For example, a polling loop might be initiated only when a program attempts to read input from the keyboard. This minimizes unnecessary polling, conserving CPU resources. Device drivers frequently use demand polling.
  • Round-Robin Polling: The CPU polls each device in a predetermined order, cycling through the list repeatedly. This ensures that all devices receive attention, preventing any single device from monopolizing the CPU’s polling time. This is common in systems with multiple peripherals.

Advantages of Polling

  • Simplicity: Polling is conceptually and implementationally straightforward. It requires minimal overhead compared to interrupt-driven systems.
  • Predictability: The CPU’s behavior is highly predictable. The maximum time it takes to respond to a device is known and bounded by the polling interval. This is critical in hard real-time systems.
  • Low Latency (for fast devices): If the device is consistently ready for communication, polling can achieve very low latency. The CPU doesn't need to wait for an interrupt to occur.
  • No Interrupt Overhead: Polling avoids the overhead associated with handling interrupts, such as context switching and interrupt handler execution.
  • Suitable for Shared Memory Systems: Polling is particularly well-suited for systems where devices communicate through shared memory. The CPU can simply read the shared memory location to check the device status.

Disadvantages of Polling

  • CPU Usage: Busy-waiting polling consumes 100% CPU time, making it impractical for most applications. Even rate-controlled polling consumes CPU cycles that could be used for other tasks.
  • Latency (for slow devices): If the device is frequently busy, the polling interval determines the latency. A long polling interval can result in significant delays in responding to device events.
  • Scalability Issues: As the number of devices increases, the polling loop becomes longer, increasing the overhead and potentially reducing system performance. Multitasking can exacerbate this problem.
  • Inefficiency: The CPU spends time checking devices that may not require attention, wasting valuable processing resources. This is particularly problematic in systems with many idle devices.
  • Potential for Starvation: If a device is consistently busy, other devices may be starved of CPU attention.

Polling vs. Interrupts

The primary alternative to polling is interrupt-driven I/O. In an interrupt-driven system, the device signals the CPU when it is ready for communication. The CPU then suspends its current task, handles the interrupt, and resumes the original task.

| Feature | Polling | Interrupts | |---|---|---| | **CPU Usage** | Potentially high (busy-waiting) or moderate (rate-controlled) | Low (CPU only responds when signaled) | | **Latency** | Dependent on polling interval | Potentially lower (immediate response to event) | | **Complexity** | Simple | More complex (requires interrupt handling mechanisms) | | **Predictability** | High | Lower (interrupt arrival times are unpredictable) | | **Overhead** | Low (no interrupt handling) | Higher (interrupt handler execution, context switching) | | **Scalability** | Poor | Better | | **Responsiveness** | Can be slow for infrequent events | Generally faster for infrequent events |

The choice between polling and interrupts depends on the specific application requirements. Interrupts are generally preferred for systems where responsiveness and efficiency are critical, and where the event arrival rate is relatively low. Polling is often used in systems where predictability and simplicity are paramount, and where the event arrival rate is high or the latency requirements are not strict. Often, a hybrid approach is used, combining the benefits of both techniques.

Applications of Polling

  • Embedded Systems: Polling is frequently used in embedded systems, particularly in resource-constrained environments where minimizing code size and complexity is important. Microcontrollers often rely heavily on polling.
  • Game Development: Game engines often use polling to check for input from joysticks, keyboards, and mice. However, more sophisticated input handling mechanisms are often employed for complex games. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) also utilize polling for synchronization.
  • Real-Time Systems: In certain real-time applications, polling is used to ensure deterministic behavior. The predictable nature of polling is crucial for meeting strict timing constraints.
  • Device Drivers: Device drivers sometimes use polling to initialize devices or to handle specific device operations.
  • Network Monitoring: Network monitoring tools may use polling to check the status of network devices and services. Network protocols often involve polling mechanisms.
  • Operating System Kernels: While modern operating systems primarily use interrupts, polling is still employed in certain situations, such as during system initialization or when handling specific device types. Kernel development often involves careful consideration of polling vs. interrupts.

Advanced Polling Techniques

  • Adaptive Polling: This technique dynamically adjusts the polling interval based on the device’s activity. If the device is frequently busy, the polling interval is shortened to reduce latency. If the device is idle, the polling interval is lengthened to conserve CPU resources.
  • Prioritized Polling: Devices are assigned priorities, and the CPU polls devices in order of priority. This ensures that critical devices receive more frequent attention.
  • Combined Polling and Interrupts: A hybrid approach where interrupts are used to signal important events, and polling is used to handle less critical events or to gather additional information. Concurrency control is important in these systems.

Considerations for Implementation

  • Polling Interval: The choice of the polling interval is crucial. A short interval reduces latency but increases CPU usage. A long interval conserves CPU resources but increases latency.
  • Device Status Register: Understanding the device’s status register is essential for correctly interpreting the device’s status.
  • Error Handling: The polling loop should include error handling to detect and handle device errors.
  • Resource Management: Carefully manage CPU resources to avoid starving other tasks.
  • Platform Specifics: Polling mechanisms can vary depending on the underlying hardware and operating system. Assembly language may be needed for low-level control.

Future Trends

As processors become more multi-core and systems become more complex, the role of polling is evolving. While interrupts will likely remain dominant for many applications, advanced polling techniques like adaptive polling and combined polling/interrupts will become increasingly important for optimizing performance and resource utilization. The rise of event-driven architectures and asynchronous programming may also influence the future of polling. Parallel processing will necessitate more sophisticated polling strategies.

See Also

External Resources & Further Reading

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=Polling_(computer_science)&oldid=47861"