Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)

1. Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)

The **Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)** is a widely used statistical measure for evaluating the accuracy of forecasting methods. It expresses prediction errors as a percentage, making it easy to understand and interpret, regardless of the data's scale. This article provides a comprehensive introduction to MAPE, its calculation, interpretation, advantages, disadvantages, and practical applications, geared towards beginners. We will also compare it to other error metrics and discuss its implications for Technical Analysis.

Definition and Formula

MAPE represents the average absolute percentage difference between the predicted values and the actual values. Essentially, it tells you, on average, how far off your predictions are, expressed as a percentage of the actual values. A lower MAPE indicates a more accurate forecasting model.

The formula for MAPE is as follows:

MAPE = (1/n) * Σ (|Actual - Forecast| / |Actual|) * 100

Where:

• n is the number of data points.
• Σ denotes the summation over all data points.
• Actual represents the actual observed value.
• Forecast represents the predicted value.
• | | denotes the absolute value (ensuring all differences are positive).

Let's break down the formula step-by-step:

1. **Calculate the Error:** For each data point, subtract the forecasted value from the actual value (Actual - Forecast). 2. **Take the Absolute Value:** Apply the absolute value function to the error. This removes any negative signs, ensuring we're measuring the magnitude of the error, not its direction. Over- and under-predictions are treated equally. 3. **Calculate the Percentage Error:** Divide the absolute error by the actual value (|Actual - Forecast| / |Actual|). This converts the error into a percentage of the actual value. This is a crucial step; using the actual value as the denominator emphasizes the relative error. 4. **Sum the Percentage Errors:** Add up all the percentage errors calculated in the previous step. 5. **Calculate the Mean:** Divide the sum of percentage errors by the total number of data points (n). 6. **Multiply by 100:** Multiply the result by 100 to express the MAPE as a percentage.

Example Calculation

Consider a scenario where we are forecasting sales for five months. Here's a table showing the actual sales and forecasted sales:

| Month | Actual Sales | Forecasted Sales | |---|---|---| | 1 | 100 | 90 | | 2 | 110 | 105 | | 3 | 120 | 110 | | 4 | 130 | 120 | | 5 | 140 | 130 |

Let's calculate the MAPE:

| Month | Actual Sales | Forecasted Sales | Error (Actual - Forecast) | Absolute Error | Percentage Error (|Error| / |Actual|) | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | 100 | 90 | 10 | 10 | 0.10 (10%) | | 2 | 110 | 105 | 5 | 5 | 0.045 (4.5%) | | 3 | 120 | 110 | 10 | 10 | 0.083 (8.3%) | | 4 | 130 | 120 | 10 | 10 | 0.077 (7.7%) | | 5 | 140 | 130 | 10 | 10 | 0.071 (7.1%) |

Sum of Percentage Errors = 0.10 + 0.045 + 0.083 + 0.077 + 0.071 = 0.376

MAPE = (1/5) * 0.376 * 100 = 7.52%

Therefore, the MAPE for this forecasting model is 7.52%. This means, on average, the forecasts are off by 7.52% of the actual sales.

Interpretation of MAPE Values

Interpreting MAPE values requires understanding a general guideline, although the acceptable level of MAPE can vary depending on the specific application and industry. Here's a common interpretation:

• **MAPE < 10%:** Excellent forecast. The model is highly accurate.
• **10% ≤ MAPE < 20%:** Good forecast. The model is reasonably accurate.
• **20% ≤ MAPE < 50%:** Fair forecast. The model is moderately accurate, but improvements are needed.
• **MAPE ≥ 50%:** Poor forecast. The model is inaccurate and requires significant revision.

These are just guidelines. A MAPE of 20% might be acceptable in some industries (like long-term economic forecasting) but unacceptable in others (like inventory management). Context is key. Consider the cost of errors when determining an acceptable MAPE. Risk Management is vital in this context.

Advantages of Using MAPE

• **Easy to Understand:** MAPE is expressed as a percentage, making it readily understandable to both technical and non-technical audiences.
• **Scale-Independent:** Unlike other error metrics (like Mean Absolute Error - MAE), MAPE is scale-independent. This means it can be used to compare forecasts across different datasets with different scales. This is especially useful when comparing forecasts for different products or regions.
• **Widely Used:** Its widespread use makes it a standard benchmark for comparing forecasting models.
• **Intuitive Interpretation:** The percentage error provides a direct and intuitive measure of forecast accuracy. It’s easy to explain to stakeholders. See also Moving Averages.

Disadvantages and Limitations of MAPE

Despite its advantages, MAPE has several limitations:

• **Sensitivity to Low Actual Values:** MAPE is highly sensitive to low actual values. When the actual value is close to zero, even a small error can result in a very large percentage error, inflating the MAPE. This can lead to misleading results. For example, if the actual value is 1 and the forecast is 2, the percentage error is 100%.
• **Asymmetry:** MAPE is not symmetric. It penalizes under-forecasting more heavily than over-forecasting. This is because the denominator (|Actual|) is always positive, but the numerator (Actual - Forecast) can be positive or negative. This asymmetry can bias the evaluation of forecasting models. Consider Bollinger Bands for a more nuanced approach.
• **Cannot Be Used with Zero Values:** If the actual value is zero, MAPE is undefined (division by zero). This is a significant limitation in datasets where zero values are common.
• **Difficulty in Comparing Across Time Series:** While scale-independent within a single time series, comparing MAPE values across different time series can be misleading if the scales of the actual values are significantly different.
• **May Not Reflect Business Impact:** MAPE focuses on percentage errors, which may not directly translate to the business impact of forecasting errors. For instance, a 10% error on a high-volume product might be more costly than a 20% error on a low-volume product. Consider Profitability Analysis alongside MAPE.

Alternatives to MAPE

Due to the limitations of MAPE, several alternative error metrics are available:

• **Mean Absolute Error (MAE):** Calculates the average absolute difference between actual and forecasted values. It's scale-dependent but less sensitive to low actual values than MAPE.
• **Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE):** Calculates the square root of the average squared difference between actual and forecasted values. It's scale-dependent and penalizes larger errors more heavily than MAE.
• **Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE):** Scales the MAE by the MAE of a naive forecast (using the previous value as the forecast). This makes it comparable across different time series. Time Series Analysis relies heavily on MASE.
• **Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE):** Uses the average of the actual and forecasted values as the denominator, making it more symmetric than MAPE. However, it can still be problematic when both actual and forecasted values are close to zero.
• **Weighted Absolute Percentage Error (WAPE):** Assigns weights to each data point based on its importance. This allows you to prioritize accuracy for specific data points.

Choosing the appropriate error metric depends on the specific characteristics of the data and the goals of the forecasting exercise. Regression Analysis can offer insights into model selection.

Applications of MAPE in Finance and Trading

MAPE is used extensively in financial forecasting and trading. Here are some examples:

• **Stock Price Prediction:** Evaluating the accuracy of models predicting future stock prices. While predicting stock prices is notoriously difficult, MAPE can help compare the performance of different models. See also Elliott Wave Theory.
• **Sales Forecasting:** Predicting future sales revenue for a company. Accurate sales forecasts are crucial for inventory management, production planning, and budgeting.
• **Demand Forecasting:** Forecasting the demand for specific products or services. This helps optimize supply chains and minimize costs.
• **Economic Forecasting:** Predicting macroeconomic variables such as GDP growth, inflation, and unemployment rates. Useful for Fundamental Analysis.
• **Volatility Forecasting:** Assessing the accuracy of models predicting future volatility of financial assets. Volatility is a key input for option pricing and risk management. Consider Implied Volatility.
• **Trading Strategy Backtesting:** Evaluating the performance of trading strategies by comparing predicted returns to actual returns. Algorithmic Trading relies heavily on robust backtesting.
• **Currency Exchange Rate Forecasting:** Assessing the accuracy of models predicting future exchange rates.
• **Commodity Price Forecasting:** Predicting future prices of commodities such as oil, gold, and agricultural products. Relevant for Trend Following.
• **Interest Rate Forecasting:** Evaluating the accuracy of models predicting future interest rates.
• **Portfolio Performance Evaluation:** Assessing the accuracy of models predicting portfolio returns. Modern Portfolio Theory benefits from accurate forecasting.
• **Forecasting website traffic:** Assessing the accuracy of models predicting website traffic for marketing campaigns.
• **Predicting customer churn:** Assessing the accuracy of models predicting which customers are likely to stop using a service.

In the context of Day Trading, MAPE can be used to evaluate the accuracy of short-term price predictions generated by technical indicators such as MACD, RSI, and Stochastic Oscillator. However, it's crucial to remember that MAPE is just one metric and should be used in conjunction with other performance measures and qualitative analysis. Always consider Candlestick Patterns alongside quantitative metrics. Understanding Support and Resistance Levels is also critical. Don’t forget to analyze Fibonacci Retracements and Chart Patterns. Also, be mindful of Market Sentiment and News Trading. Finally, always practice proper Position Sizing and Risk-Reward Ratio management. Understanding Correlation is also vital. Consider the impact of Economic Indicators. Be aware of Gap Analysis. Learn about Volume Analysis. Recognize Head and Shoulders Patterns. Study Double Top and Bottom Patterns. Explore Triangles. Evaluate Wedges. Analyze Flags and Pennants. Understand Harmonic Patterns. Consider Ichimoku Cloud.

Conclusion

MAPE is a valuable tool for evaluating forecasting accuracy, particularly due to its ease of interpretation and scale-independence. However, it's essential to be aware of its limitations, especially its sensitivity to low actual values and its asymmetry. Choosing the right error metric depends on the specific application and the characteristics of the data. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of MAPE and considering alternative metrics, you can make more informed decisions about forecasting models and improve the accuracy of your predictions. Remember to use MAPE in conjunction with other analytical techniques for a comprehensive assessment of forecasting performance.

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners