WP:EW

From binaryoption
Revision as of 07:36, 31 March 2025 by Admin (talk | contribs) (@pipegas_WP-output)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Баннер1
  1. Editing Wikipedia: Avoiding Edit Wars (WP:EW)

Edit wars are a disruptive and counterproductive aspect of collaborative editing on Wikipedia. This article, based on the guideline WP:EW, aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of edit wars, their causes, how to avoid them, and what to do if you find yourself in one. It’s geared towards new editors and those seeking to improve their understanding of collaborative editing practices.

What is an Edit War?

An edit war occurs when two or more editors repeatedly revert each other's edits, creating a cycle of changes and counter-changes without attempting to reach consensus. This is often characterized by a lack of discussion and a stubborn insistence on a particular viewpoint. An edit war isn't simply disagreement; it’s the *method* of resolving that disagreement – through repeated reverting rather than collaborative discussion.

The core problem with edit wars is that they:

  • **Disrupt Wikipedia's Stability:** Constant reverting makes the article unstable and unreliable for readers.
  • **Waste Editors' Time:** Reverting takes time and energy that could be better spent improving the article.
  • **Create a Hostile Environment:** Edit wars foster animosity between editors and discourage constructive collaboration.
  • **Violate Wikipedia's Principles:** They directly contradict the principles of WP:CIVIL and WP:CONSENSUS.

Identifying an Edit War

Recognizing an edit war is the first step in addressing it. Here are some key indicators:

  • **Repeated Reverts:** Multiple editors consistently undoing each other's changes. The 3-revert rule is a guideline that limits reverting; exceeding it can lead to sanctions.
  • **Lack of Edit Summaries:** Edits made without clear explanations of the changes. A good edit summary is crucial for understanding an editor's rationale.
  • **Absence of Discussion:** No attempt to discuss the disputed content on the article's talk page.
  • **Personal Attacks:** Aggressive or disrespectful behavior towards other editors. This is a violation of WP:NPA.
  • **Focus on Position, Not Improvement:** Editors are more concerned with "winning" the argument than with improving the article's quality.

Causes of Edit Wars

Understanding the root causes of edit wars can help prevent them. Common causes include:

  • **Content Disputes:** Disagreements over the accuracy, neutrality, or relevance of information. This is the most frequent cause.
  • **Interpretation of Policies:** Differing understandings of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. For example, disagreements over WP:V (Verifiability) or WP:NPOV (Neutral Point of View).
  • **Strong Opinions:** Editors with strong personal beliefs attempting to impose their views on the article.
  • **Lack of Communication:** Failure to communicate effectively with other editors and understand their perspectives.
  • **Territoriality:** Editors becoming overly attached to certain parts of an article and resisting any changes.
  • **Misunderstandings:** Simple misinterpretations of another editor’s intentions.


How to Avoid Edit Wars

Prevention is always better than cure. Here's how to avoid getting involved in an edit war:

  • **Discuss First:** Before making any significant changes to an article, *always* discuss them on the article's talk page. Propose your changes and explain your reasoning.
  • **Assume Good Faith:** Assume that other editors are acting in good faith, even if you disagree with them. WP:AGF is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia.
  • **Use Edit Summaries:** Provide clear and concise edit summaries explaining your changes.
  • **Be Willing to Compromise:** Be prepared to compromise and find solutions that address the concerns of all parties involved.
  • **Focus on Sources:** Base your edits on reliable WP:SOURCES. Strong sourcing is the best way to support your claims.
  • **Seek Third Opinions:** If you're unable to reach consensus with another editor, seek the opinion of a neutral third party. You can use the WP:3O process or ask for help at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution page.
  • **Understand the Articles Scope:** Ensure your edits align with the established scope and purpose of the article. Don't introduce unrelated material.
  • **Be Patient:** Reaching consensus can take time. Be patient and persistent in your efforts to collaborate.

What to Do If You're in an Edit War

If you find yourself in an edit war, here's what you should do:

1. **Stop Reverting:** The *first* and most important step is to stop reverting. Continuing to revert will only escalate the conflict. 2. **Check the Edit History:** Review the article's edit history to understand the nature of the dispute. 3. **Go to the Talk Page:** Initiate a discussion on the article's talk page. Clearly explain your position and why you believe your edits are justified. 4. **Be Civil and Respectful:** Maintain a civil tone and avoid personal attacks. Focus on the content, not the editor. 5. **Seek Mediation:** If the discussion is unproductive, consider requesting mediation from a neutral third party. 6. **Report the Edit War:** If the edit war continues despite your best efforts, you may need to report it to an administrator. You can do this at WP:AN3 (Administrators' Noticeboard/3RR). Be sure to provide a clear and concise summary of the situation, including links to the article's edit history and talk page.

The 3-Revert Rule

The 3-revert rule is a guideline that limits the number of times an editor can revert another editor's changes within a 24-hour period. Specifically, an editor may not make more than three reverts to a page within a 24-hour period. Exceeding this limit can result in sanctions, such as a temporary block from editing.

However, the 3-revert rule is not a license to make three reverts. It's a guideline intended to encourage discussion and prevent edit wars. Even if you haven't exceeded the 3-revert limit, you should still avoid reverting if possible.

Exceptions to the 3-revert rule include:

  • **Vandalism:** Reverting obvious vandalism is generally permitted.
  • **Removal of Disruptive Edits:** Reverting edits that violate Wikipedia's policies, such as personal attacks or copyright violations.
  • **Protection of Article:** Reverting edits after an article has been protected.

Dispute Resolution Resources

Wikipedia offers a variety of resources for resolving disputes:

  • **Talk Pages:** The primary venue for discussing and resolving content disputes.
  • **Wikipedia:Dispute resolution:** A central hub for dispute resolution processes.
  • **Wikipedia:Mediation:** A process where a neutral mediator helps parties reach a consensus.
  • **Wikipedia:Requests for comment:** A forum for seeking feedback from the community on disputed content.
  • **Administrators' Noticeboard/3RR:** A forum for reporting violations of the 3-revert rule.
  • **Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations:** For reporting suspected sockpuppetry (multiple accounts used by a single editor to manipulate discussions).


Understanding Technical Analysis & Market Trends

While this article focuses on editing etiquette, understanding the *topic* you’re editing can help avoid disputes. If editing articles related to finance or trading, consider these concepts:

  • **Technical Analysis:** Using historical price data to predict future price movements. Key concepts include:
   *   Candlestick Patterns: Visual representations of price movements. ([1](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/candlestick.asp))
   *   Support and Resistance Levels: Price levels where buying or selling pressure is expected to emerge. ([2](https://www.babypips.com/learn/forex/support-resistance))
   *   Trend Lines: Lines drawn on a chart to identify the direction of a trend. ([3](https://www.schoolofpips.com/trend-lines/))
  • **Indicators:** Mathematical calculations based on price and volume data.
   *   Moving Averages:  Smoothing price data to identify trends. ([4](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/movingaverage.asp))
   *   MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence): A trend-following momentum indicator. ([5](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/macd.asp))
   *   RSI (Relative Strength Index): An oscillator used to measure the magnitude of recent price changes. ([6](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rsi.asp))
   *   Bollinger Bands:  Volatility bands plotted above and below a moving average. ([7](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bollingerbands.asp))
  • **Market Trends:**
   *   Uptrend: A series of higher highs and higher lows. ([8](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/uptrend.asp))
   *   Downtrend: A series of lower highs and lower lows. ([9](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/downtrend.asp))
   *   Sideways Trend:  Price movement within a range. ([10](https://www.forex.com/en-us/education/what-is-a-sideways-trend/))
  • **Trading Strategies:**
   *   Day Trading: Buying and selling within the same day. ([11](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/daytrading.asp))
   *   Swing Trading: Holding positions for several days or weeks. ([12](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/swingtrading.asp))
   *   Scalping: Making small profits from tiny price changes. ([13](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/scalping.asp))
   *   Position Trading: Holding positions for months or years. ([14](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/positiontrading.asp))
  • **Economic Indicators**
   * GDP (Gross Domestic Product): A measure of a country's economic output. ([15](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gdp.asp))
   * Inflation Rate: The rate at which prices are rising. ([16](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inflation.asp))
   * Unemployment Rate: The percentage of the labor force that is unemployed. ([17](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unemployment-rate.asp))
   * Interest Rates: The cost of borrowing money. ([18](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/interestrate.asp))
  • **Market Psychology**
   * Fear and Greed:  Emotional drivers of market behavior. ([19](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/042915/fear-greed-investing.asp))
   * Herd Mentality:  Following the crowd. ([20](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/herdbbehavior.asp))
   * Confirmation Bias: Seeking out information that confirms existing beliefs. ([21](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/confirmationbias.asp))



Conclusion

Edit wars are detrimental to Wikipedia's collaborative environment and quality. By understanding the causes of edit wars, following the guidelines for avoiding them, and utilizing the available dispute resolution resources, you can contribute to a more productive and harmonious editing experience. Remember that the goal is to build a great encyclopedia, and that requires collaboration and respect.



WP:CONSENSUS WP:CIVIL WP:NPOV WP:V WP:AGF WP:3O Wikipedia:Dispute resolution WP:AN3 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations Edit summary Talk page 3-revert rule

Баннер
Retrieved from "https://binaryoption.wiki/index.php?title=WP:EW&oldid=53519"