Theorem proving

1. Theorem Proving

Introduction

Theorem proving is a fundamental aspect of Mathematical Logic and Computer Science, concerned with developing and verifying logical arguments to establish the truth of mathematical statements (theorems). It's the process of demonstrating, in a rigorous and unambiguous manner, that a particular conclusion follows logically from a set of given premises (axioms and previously proven theorems). This article aims to provide a comprehensive introduction to theorem proving, accessible to beginners, covering its core concepts, methods, and applications.

Core Concepts

At the heart of theorem proving lie several key concepts:

• **Propositional Logic:** The simplest form of logic, dealing with statements (propositions) that are either true or false. Connectives like "and," "or," "not," "implies," and "if and only if" are used to combine propositions. Understanding Truth Tables is crucial here.

• **Predicate Logic (First-Order Logic):** An extension of propositional logic that introduces variables, quantifiers ("for all" and "there exists"), and predicates to express properties and relationships between objects. This allows for more complex and nuanced statements.

• **Axioms:** Fundamental assumptions that are taken to be true without proof. They serve as the starting point for building a logical system. Examples include the axioms of Set Theory or Euclidean geometry.

• **Theorems:** Statements that have been proven to be true based on axioms and previously proven theorems.

• **Proof:** A sequence of logical steps, each justified by a rule of inference, that demonstrates the truth of a theorem. A proof must be rigorous and unambiguous.

• **Rules of Inference:** Formal rules that allow us to derive new statements from existing ones. Common rules include *modus ponens* (if P implies Q, and P is true, then Q is true), *modus tollens* (if P implies Q, and Q is false, then P is false), and universal instantiation.

• **Logical Equivalence:** Two statements are logically equivalent if they have the same truth value under all possible interpretations. De Morgan's Laws demonstrate logical equivalence.

• **Validity and Soundness:** A proof is *valid* if the conclusion follows logically from the premises, *regardless* of whether the premises are actually true. A proof is *sound* if it is both valid *and* the premises are true. Soundness guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Methods of Theorem Proving

Several methods are employed in theorem proving, each with its strengths and weaknesses:

• **Direct Proof:** Starts with the premises and uses rules of inference to directly derive the conclusion. This is often the most straightforward method when applicable.

• **Indirect Proof:**

   *   **Proof by Contradiction:**  Assumes the negation of the theorem to be proven. If this assumption leads to a contradiction (a statement that is both true and false), then the original theorem must be true.

   *   **Proof by Contrapositive:**  Instead of proving "if P then Q," prove its contrapositive: "if not Q then not P." These two statements are logically equivalent.

• **Mathematical Induction:** Used to prove statements about natural numbers. It involves two steps: a base case (showing the statement is true for the smallest natural number) and an inductive step (showing that if the statement is true for some natural number *k*, then it is also true for *k+1*).

• **Resolution:** A refutation-complete method commonly used in automated theorem proving. It involves converting statements to conjunctive normal form (CNF) and repeatedly applying the resolution rule until a contradiction is found. This is the basis of many Expert Systems.

• **Tableau Method:** A method for determining the validity of logical formulas. It involves constructing a tree-like structure (a tableau) and attempting to find a branch that contains both a formula and its negation, indicating inconsistency.

• **Model Checking:** A technique for verifying the correctness of systems by exploring all possible states. This is particularly useful for verifying hardware and software designs.

Automated Theorem Proving

While many theorems can be proven by hand, the process can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially for complex statements. Automated theorem proving (ATP) aims to develop computer programs that can prove theorems automatically.

Key aspects of ATP include:

• **Theorem Provers:** Software tools designed to automate the process of theorem proving. Examples include E, Vampire, Prover9, and Z3.

• **SMT Solvers (Satisfiability Modulo Theories):** A type of theorem prover that can reason about a combination of logical theories, such as arithmetic, arrays, and bit vectors. These are essential for Algorithmic Trading verification.

• **Interactive Theorem Provers:** Require human guidance to complete the proof. They provide a framework for constructing proofs and checking their correctness. Examples include Coq, Isabelle, and Lean. These are often used for formal verification of critical systems.

• **Proof Assistants:** Help users construct proofs by providing suggestions and checking their correctness.

• **Heuristics**: ATP systems rely heavily on heuristics – rules of thumb – to guide the search for a proof. These heuristics are crucial for managing the complexity of the search space. Trend Following strategies in trading use similar heuristics.

• **SAT Solvers**: Solvers for the Boolean Satisfiability Problem (SAT). They are often used as building blocks in more complex ATP systems. Similar to Fibonacci retracement in technical analysis, SAT solvers focus on a defined problem space.

Applications of Theorem Proving

Theorem proving has a wide range of applications beyond pure mathematics:

• **Formal Verification:** Ensuring the correctness of hardware and software systems. This is critical for safety-critical applications, such as aircraft control systems and medical devices. Risk Management in finance uses similar principles of formal verification.

• **Software Engineering:** Developing provably correct software.

• **Artificial Intelligence:** Reasoning and problem-solving.

• **Logic Programming:** Programming languages based on logical inference. Machine Learning algorithms often employ logical reasoning.

• **Cryptography:** Verifying the security of cryptographic protocols.

• **Database Systems:** Optimizing queries and ensuring data consistency. Data Mining relies on logically sound data analysis.

• **Circuit Design:** Verifying the correctness of digital circuits.

• **Financial Modeling**: Validating the logic of complex financial models ensuring accuracy and reliability. Similar to how Elliott Wave Theory seeks to identify patterns, theorem proving aims to identify logical consistencies.

• **Smart Contracts**: Verifying the security and correctness of smart contracts on blockchain platforms. Blockchain Technology benefits from the rigorous validation provided by theorem proving.

Strategies in Theorem Proving

Effective theorem proving doesn't just depend on knowing the rules; it requires strategy. Here are some key strategies:

• **Working Backwards**: Start with the conclusion and try to find premises that would imply it.

• **Simplification**: Simplify complex expressions using logical equivalences. Moving Averages in technical analysis are a form of simplification.

• **Case Analysis**: Divide the problem into different cases and prove the theorem for each case separately.

• **Abstraction**: Ignore irrelevant details and focus on the essential aspects of the problem. Similar to Support and Resistance Levels which abstract key price points.

• **Generalization**: Extend a specific result to a more general case.

• **Specialization**: Apply a general result to a specific case.

• **Exploiting Symmetry**: Identify and exploit symmetrical properties of the problem.

• **Looking for Counterexamples**: If you're struggling to prove a theorem, try to find a counterexample – a case where the theorem fails. This can help you identify errors in your reasoning or refine the theorem. This is akin to Backtesting strategies in trading.

Technical Analysis and Theorem Proving Parallels

While seemingly disparate, there are parallels between technical analysis in finance and theorem proving:

• **Hypothesis Formation**: Both start with a hypothesis (a statement to be proven/tested). In finance, this might be "a golden cross indicates an uptrend." In theorem proving, it's the theorem itself.

• **Evidence Gathering**: Technical analysis gathers historical data as evidence. Theorem proving uses axioms and previously proven theorems.

• **Logical Deduction**: Both use logical deduction to draw conclusions. Technical analysts use chart patterns and indicators to predict future price movements. Theorem provers use rules of inference.

• **Validation**: Technical analysis validates its hypotheses through backtesting and real-time trading. Theorem proving validates its theorems through rigorous proofs.

• **Identifying Fallacies**: Both require identifying logical fallacies. In finance, this could be misinterpreting correlations as causations. In theorem proving, it's identifying invalid arguments. Bollinger Bands can help identify volatility, potentially avoiding fallacies based on static price points.

Indicators, Trends & Strategies - Analogies

Here's a breakdown of analogies between theorem proving concepts and trading concepts:

1. **Axioms <-> Fundamental Analysis**: Fundamental analysis relies on core economic principles (axioms) to assess asset value. 2. **Theorems <-> Trading Strategies**: A successful trading strategy (theorem) is proven through consistent profitability. 3. **Proof <-> Backtesting**: Backtesting provides evidence (proof) for the effectiveness of a trading strategy. 4. **Rules of Inference <-> Trading Rules**: Trading rules define the conditions under which trades are executed. 5. **Logical Equivalence <-> Alternative Indicators**: Different indicators can provide logically equivalent signals. 6. **Validity <-> Conceptual Soundness**: A trading strategy must be conceptually sound (valid) even if it doesn't always work in practice. 7. **Soundness <-> Consistent Profitability**: A truly sound trading strategy is both conceptually valid and consistently profitable. 8. **Contradiction <-> Failed Trade**: A losing trade can be seen as a contradiction to the initial hypothesis. 9. **Mathematical Induction <-> Compounding**: The principle of compounding is analogous to mathematical induction. 10. **Resolution <-> Pattern Recognition**: Identifying patterns in charts (resolution) to make trading decisions. 11. **Trend Following**: Utilizing established trends to dictate trading decisions, similar to deductive reasoning. MACD is a trend-following indicator. 12. **Moving Averages**: Smoothing price data to identify underlying trends. Exponential Moving Average (EMA) is a popular example. 13. **Support and Resistance Levels**: Identifying key price points where buying or selling pressure is expected. Pivot Points help identify these levels. 14. **Fibonacci Retracement**: Utilizing Fibonacci ratios to predict potential price reversal points. Golden Ratio is central to this technique. 15. **Bollinger Bands**: Measuring market volatility and identifying potential overbought or oversold conditions. Standard Deviation is used in their calculation. 16. **Relative Strength Index (RSI)**: Identifying overbought or oversold conditions based on price momentum. Overbought/Oversold indicators are crucial. 17. **Stochastic Oscillator**: Comparing a security’s closing price to its price range over a given period. %K and %D lines are key components. 18. **Ichimoku Cloud**: A comprehensive indicator that provides multiple signals, including trend direction and support/resistance levels. Tenkan-sen and Kijun-sen are key lines. 19. **Average True Range (ATR)**: Measuring market volatility. Volatility Index (VIX) is a broader measure of volatility. 20. **Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP)**: Calculating the average price of a security weighted by volume. On Balance Volume (OBV) links volume to price. 21. **Donchian Channels**: Identifying high and low prices over a specified period. Breakout Trading often utilizes these channels. 22. **Parabolic SAR**: Identifying potential trend reversals. Trailing Stop Loss can be set based on SAR signals. 23. **Elliott Wave Theory**: Identifying patterns in price movements that suggest potential trend reversals. Wave Patterns are the foundation of this theory. 24. **Harmonic Patterns**: Identifying specific price patterns that suggest potential trading opportunities. Gartley Pattern is a common example. 25. **Candlestick Patterns**: Identifying potential price reversals or continuations based on candlestick formations. Doji Candlestick is a reversal signal. 26. **Correlation Analysis**: Identifying relationships between different assets, akin to finding logical connections. Pearson Correlation Coefficient is used to measure this.

Conclusion

Theorem proving is a powerful and versatile tool with applications far beyond mathematics. Understanding its core concepts and methods is essential for anyone involved in rigorous reasoning, formal verification, or the development of intelligent systems. While complex in its advanced forms, the fundamental principles are accessible to beginners and provide a foundation for further exploration. The parallels to financial analysis emphasize the universality of logical thought processes.

Mathematical Logic Computer Science Set Theory Truth Tables De Morgan's Laws Expert Systems Algorithmic Trading Machine Learning Blockchain Technology

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners