Test coverage

1. Test Coverage

Test coverage is a crucial metric in software development, and increasingly important in the development of MediaWiki extensions and modifications. It measures the degree to which the source code of a program is executed when a particular test suite is run. In simpler terms, it tells you how much of your code is actually *tested*. While achieving 100% test coverage doesn't guarantee a bug-free application, it significantly reduces the risk of undetected errors and helps maintain code quality over time. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of test coverage for those new to the concept, especially within the context of MediaWiki development.

1. 1. Why is Test Coverage Important?

Several compelling reasons highlight the importance of test coverage:

• **Reduced Bugs:** Higher test coverage means a larger portion of your code has been exercised by tests, increasing the likelihood of finding and fixing bugs *before* they reach production.
• **Increased Confidence:** When you have good test coverage, you can refactor and modify your code with greater confidence, knowing that your tests will catch any regressions (unintentional introduction of new bugs). Consider the implications for Code Refactoring when changing core MediaWiki functionality.
• **Improved Code Quality:** The process of writing tests often forces developers to think more carefully about the design and structure of their code, leading to cleaner, more maintainable systems.
• **Documentation:** Tests can serve as a form of documentation, illustrating how the code is intended to be used.
• **Risk Mitigation:** In complex projects, test coverage helps to identify areas of the code that are particularly risky or prone to errors.
• **Facilitates Collaboration:** Well-covered code is easier for new developers to understand and contribute to.

1. 1. Types of Test Coverage

There are several different types of test coverage, each measuring a different aspect of code execution. Understanding these types is key to creating a robust testing strategy.

• **Statement Coverage:** This is the simplest form of coverage. It measures the percentage of statements in your code that have been executed by your tests. While easy to measure, it's often insufficient on its own. A statement might be executed, but not all possible paths through that statement might be tested. For instance, a statement with an `if/else` condition will only cover one branch if only one condition is met during testing.
• **Branch Coverage (Decision Coverage):** This measures the percentage of branches (outcomes of `if` statements, loops, etc.) that have been executed. Branch coverage is more thorough than statement coverage, as it ensures that all possible execution paths through decision points are tested. It's a significant improvement, offering a better understanding of conditional logic.
• **Condition Coverage:** This focuses on the individual conditions within a branch. For example, in an `if (A && B)` statement, condition coverage would require tests that exercise A being true and false, and B being true and false, *regardless* of the overall outcome of the `if` statement. This is more granular than branch coverage.
• **Line Coverage:** Similar to statement coverage, but measures the percentage of lines of code executed. Often used interchangeably with statement coverage in practice.
• **Function Coverage:** This measures the percentage of functions or methods in your code that have been called by your tests. It's a basic check to ensure that all functions are at least invoked.
• **Path Coverage:** This is the most comprehensive, but also the most difficult to achieve. It aims to test every possible path through the code. For complex codebases, the number of paths can be astronomical, making full path coverage impractical. It is often used for critical sections of code.
• **Modified Condition/Decision Coverage (MC/DC):** This is a stringent coverage criterion often required in safety-critical systems. It requires that each condition in a decision independently affects the outcome of the decision.

1. 1. Measuring Test Coverage in MediaWiki Development

Several tools can be used to measure test coverage in a MediaWiki environment. The most common approach leverages PHPUnit, the standard testing framework for PHP.

1. **PHPUnit Setup:** Ensure you have PHPUnit installed and configured correctly for your MediaWiki environment. This typically involves setting up a `phpunit.xml` configuration file that specifies the location of your MediaWiki code and test suites. Refer to PHPUnit Integration for detailed instructions. 2. **Xdebug Installation:** Xdebug is a PHP extension that provides debugging and profiling capabilities. It's essential for collecting code coverage data. Install and configure Xdebug to work with PHPUnit. 3. **Code Coverage Driver:** PHPUnit uses a code coverage driver to collect the coverage data. The default driver is often sufficient, but you can choose different drivers depending on your needs. 4. **Running Tests with Coverage:** Run your tests using PHPUnit with the `--coverage-text` or `--coverage-html` option.

   *   `--coverage-text`:  Displays the coverage report in the console.
   *   `--coverage-html`:  Generates an HTML report with detailed coverage information, including highlighted source code. This is generally preferred for detailed analysis.

   Example: `phpunit --coverage-html coverage tests/`

5. **Analyzing the Report:** The HTML report provides a detailed breakdown of coverage for each file, class, and method. You can identify areas of code that are not covered by tests and write new tests to address those gaps. Pay particular attention to areas with low coverage.

1. 1. Strategies for Improving Test Coverage

Achieving high test coverage is an iterative process. Here are some strategies to help you improve coverage:

• **Start with Unit Tests:** Focus on writing unit tests for individual functions and methods. This is the easiest way to get started and build a foundation of coverage. See Unit Testing Best Practices.
• **Test Boundary Conditions:** Always test the boundaries of your code, such as minimum and maximum values, empty strings, and null values. These are common sources of errors.
• **Test Error Conditions:** Test how your code handles errors and exceptions. Make sure that errors are handled gracefully and that appropriate error messages are displayed.
• **Test Different Input Combinations:** For functions that take multiple inputs, test different combinations of inputs to ensure that the code works correctly in all scenarios.
• **Use Mock Objects:** Mock objects allow you to isolate the code you are testing from its dependencies. This makes it easier to write focused tests and improve coverage. See Mocking in PHPUnit.
• **Refactor Your Code:** Sometimes, the easiest way to improve test coverage is to refactor your code to make it more testable. This might involve breaking down large functions into smaller, more manageable ones.
• **Code Reviews:** Have other developers review your code and tests to identify gaps in coverage. A fresh pair of eyes can often spot issues that you might have missed.
• **Target Specific Coverage Metrics:** Set specific coverage goals (e.g., 80% branch coverage) and track your progress.
• **Prioritize Based on Risk:** Focus on testing the most critical and complex parts of your code first.
• **Test-Driven Development (TDD):** Consider adopting a TDD approach, where you write the tests *before* you write the code. This forces you to think about the requirements and design of your code from a testing perspective.

1. 1. Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• **Focusing on Coverage Numbers Alone:** High test coverage doesn't guarantee quality. It's important to write *meaningful* tests that actually verify the behavior of your code. A test that simply asserts that a function returns a value without checking the value itself is not very useful.
• **Writing Tests That Are Too Broad:** Broad tests that cover multiple functionalities can be difficult to maintain and debug. It's better to write focused tests that test a single aspect of your code.
• **Ignoring Edge Cases:** Edge cases are often overlooked, but they can be a significant source of errors.
• **Not Keeping Tests Up-to-Date:** As your code changes, your tests need to be updated to reflect those changes. Outdated tests can be misleading and can give you a false sense of security.
• **Over-Mocking:** While mocking is useful, excessive mocking can make your tests brittle and less reliable.

1. 1. Test Coverage and MediaWiki Specifics

MediaWiki's architecture presents unique challenges and considerations for test coverage.

• **Database Interactions:** Testing code that interacts with the database requires careful planning. You should use a testing database and avoid modifying the production database. Consider using database mocking or integration tests with a temporary database setup.
• **Caching:** MediaWiki uses extensive caching. Ensure that your tests clear the cache before and after each test to avoid stale data. See MediaWiki Caching.
• **Hooks and Extensions:** Testing hooks and extensions requires understanding how they interact with the core MediaWiki code. Integration tests are often necessary to verify that hooks and extensions work correctly.
• **Internationalization (i18n):** If your code supports multiple languages, you should test it with different locales to ensure that it works correctly in all languages.
• **User Interface (UI) Tests:** Testing the user interface requires a browser automation tool, such as Selenium or Cypress. UI tests can be time-consuming to write and maintain, but they are essential for ensuring that the user interface is working correctly.

1. 1. Advanced Techniques

• **Mutation Testing:** A technique where small changes (mutations) are intentionally introduced into the code, and tests are run to see if they detect the mutations. If tests don't detect a mutation, it indicates a weakness in the test suite.
• **Grey-box Testing:** Combines elements of black-box and white-box testing. Testers have partial knowledge of the internal structure of the code.
• **Fuzz Testing:** Involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data as input to the code to identify vulnerabilities and errors.

1. 1. Resources

• [PHPUnit Documentation](https://phpunit.de/manual/current/)
• [Xdebug Documentation](https://xdebug.org/)
• [Code Coverage](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_coverage)
• [Mutation Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation_testing)
• [Software Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_testing)
• [Static Code Analysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_code_analysis)
• [Dynamic Analysis](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_analysis_(software_testing))
• [Black-box Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-box_testing)
• [White-box Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-box_testing)
• [Test-Driven Development](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development)
• [Continuous Integration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration)
• [Continuous Delivery](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_delivery)
• [Regression Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_testing)
• [Acceptance Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_testing)
• [Alpha Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_testing)
• [Beta Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_testing)
• [Performance Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_testing)
• [Load Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_testing)
• [Stress Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_testing)
• [Security Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_testing)
• [Usability Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability_testing)
• [Agile Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_testing)
• [Exploratory Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_testing)
• [Test Automation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_automation)
• [Test Case Design](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_case_design)
• [Test Management](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_management)
• [Test Data Management](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_data_management)
• [Test Environment Management](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_environment_management)

Debugging MediaWiki Extension Development PHP Coding Standards MediaWiki API MediaWiki Architecture Code Style Guide Security Best Practices Database Schema Configuration Version Control