Amos Tversky

1. Amos Tversky

Amos Tversky (March 16, 1937 – June 2, 1996) was an Israeli-American cognitive psychologist and statistician, best known for his work with Daniel Kahneman, which challenged the standard rational choice theory in economics and psychology. Their collaborative research formed the basis of the field of Behavioral Economics, fundamentally altering how economists and psychologists understand decision-making under uncertainty. Tversky’s contributions extended beyond theory, influencing fields as diverse as medicine, law, and political science. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Tversky's life, work, and lasting impact, suitable for those new to the subject.

Early Life and Education

Amos Tversky was born in Haifa, Mandatory Palestine (now Israel) to Israeli parents. His father, Yehezkel Tversky, was a professor of psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and his mother, Miriam, was a teacher. He grew up in a stimulating intellectual environment, fostering a natural curiosity and analytical mind. He received his early education in Haifa and later studied at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, earning a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology and Mathematics in 1959.

He served in the Israeli Army's psychological warfare unit, applying his nascent understanding of human behavior in a practical setting. This experience further solidified his interest in the complexities of human judgment. He continued his studies at the University of Michigan, where he earned a Ph.D. in Mathematical Psychology in 1966. His dissertation focused on the development of a formal theory of recognition, laying the groundwork for his later work on judgment and decision-making. He then spent a year at MIT before joining the faculty at Stanford University in 1967, where he remained for the rest of his career.

Collaboration with Daniel Kahneman

The most significant period of Tversky’s career was his long-term collaboration with Daniel Kahneman, which began in the early 1970s. Kahneman, a psychologist with a background in peace studies, and Tversky, a mathematically-trained psychologist, formed a remarkably complementary partnership. Kahneman brought a deep understanding of psychological processes, while Tversky provided the mathematical and statistical rigor needed to formalize their observations.

Their collaboration was characterized by a unique dynamic – they would engage in intense discussions, often debating different perspectives until they arrived at a shared understanding. They didn’t publish extensively *together* initially, but their ideas were deeply interwoven. Kahneman later acknowledged that Tversky was the more intuitive thinker, generating the initial ideas, while he, Kahneman, would focus on refining the arguments and turning them into formal theories.

Prospect Theory

Perhaps their most enduring contribution is Prospect Theory, published in 1979 in *Econometrica*. This theory challenged the prevailing "Expected Utility Theory," which posits that individuals make decisions based on the expected value of potential outcomes, weighted by their probabilities. Prospect Theory, in contrast, proposes that people evaluate potential losses and gains differently, exhibiting a phenomenon known as *loss aversion*.

Key principles of Prospect Theory include:

• **Value Function:** Individuals perceive value relative to a reference point, typically their current state. Gains and losses are evaluated as deviations from this reference point, and losses loom larger than equivalent gains. This is a core concept in understanding Risk Management within financial markets.
• **Weighting Function:** People do not weight probabilities linearly. They tend to overweigh small probabilities and underweigh large probabilities. This explains phenomena like the popularity of lottery tickets (overweighting the small probability of winning) and insurance (overweighting the small probability of a catastrophic event). This impacts the assessment of Fibonacci Retracements and other probability-based indicators.
• **Framing Effects:** The way information is presented (framed) can significantly influence decisions, even if the underlying options are objectively the same. For example, people are more likely to choose a treatment framed as having a 90% survival rate than one framed as having a 10% mortality rate, even though these are equivalent. This relates directly to understanding Support and Resistance Levels – how they are perceived matters.

Prospect Theory has had a profound impact on economics, finance, and marketing. It explains a wide range of behavioral biases that contradict the assumptions of rational choice theory. It’s a critical component in understanding Trend Following strategies, as emotional reactions to gains and losses can significantly impact trading decisions.

Heuristics and Biases

Tversky and Kahneman also identified a number of cognitive *heuristics* – mental shortcuts that people use to simplify complex decisions. While these heuristics can be useful in many situations, they can also lead to systematic errors in judgment, known as *cognitive biases*. Some of the most well-known heuristics and biases they identified include:

• **Representativeness Heuristic:** Judging the probability of an event based on how similar it is to a prototype or stereotype. For example, assuming someone who is quiet and reads a lot is more likely to be a librarian than a salesperson, even though there are far more salespeople than librarians. This can lead to misinterpretations of Candlestick Patterns.
• **Availability Heuristic:** Estimating the likelihood of an event based on how easily examples come to mind. For example, people often overestimate the risk of dying in a plane crash because plane crashes receive extensive media coverage, even though they are statistically rare. This influences the perception of Moving Averages – recent price action is more readily available in memory.
• **Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic:** Relying too heavily on an initial piece of information (the "anchor") when making estimates, even if the anchor is irrelevant. For example, if asked to estimate the population of Chicago after first being asked if it's more or less than 10 million, people's estimates will tend to be closer to 10 million than they would be otherwise. This impacts the setting of Stop-Loss Orders.
• **Confirmation Bias:** Seeking out information that confirms existing beliefs and ignoring information that contradicts them. This is a common pitfall in Technical Analysis, where traders may selectively focus on indicators that support their existing views.
• **Overconfidence Bias:** Having an inflated sense of one’s own abilities and knowledge. This leads to excessive trading and poor Position Sizing.
• **Hindsight Bias:** The tendency to believe, after an event has occurred, that one would have predicted it. This affects the analysis of past Market Corrections.

These heuristics and biases demonstrate that human judgment is not always rational and that people are prone to making predictable errors. Understanding these biases is crucial for making more informed decisions in a variety of contexts, particularly in fields like finance where accurate risk assessment is paramount. The study of these biases also underlines the importance of Diversification in investment portfolios.

The Linda Problem

One of Tversky and Kahneman’s most famous experiments, known as “The Linda Problem,” vividly illustrates the representativeness heuristic. Participants were presented with a description of Linda, a young woman who is outspoken, bright, and deeply concerned with social issues. They were then asked to judge the probability of Linda being different types of people.

Participants consistently rated Linda as more likely to be a "feminist activist" than a "bank teller." However, the probability of being a bank teller is statistically higher because bank tellers represent a larger proportion of the population. The paradox arises because the description of Linda is more *representative* of a feminist activist than a bank teller, leading people to ignore the base rate (the overall prevalence of bank tellers in the population).

This experiment highlights the tendency to rely on stereotypes and ignore statistical information when making judgments. It demonstrates the dangers of focusing on superficial similarities rather than objective probabilities. This is relevant to understanding the potential pitfalls of Elliott Wave Theory, which relies heavily on pattern recognition.

Further Research and Contributions

Beyond Prospect Theory and heuristics and biases, Tversky made significant contributions to other areas of cognitive psychology and statistics, including:

• **Judgment under Uncertainty:** He developed formal models of how people make judgments in situations where information is incomplete or ambiguous.
• **Decision Making:** He explored the psychological processes involved in making choices, particularly in situations involving risk and uncertainty.
• **Statistical Reasoning:** He investigated people’s understanding of statistical concepts and their ability to apply them correctly. His work showed that people often struggle with basic statistical reasoning, even experts in other fields.
• **Power Law of Preferences:** This theory, developed later in his career, suggests that the perceived difference in value between two options decreases as the absolute magnitude of the options increases. For example, the difference between $10 and $20 feels larger than the difference between $100 and $110. This relates to Bollinger Bands and the perception of volatility.

Legacy and Impact

Amos Tversky’s work revolutionized the fields of psychology and economics. He challenged the traditional assumptions of rational choice theory and demonstrated that human judgment is often flawed and biased. His research has had a lasting impact on a wide range of disciplines, including:

• **Behavioral Economics:** Tversky and Kahneman are considered the founders of this field, which integrates psychological insights into economic models.
• **Finance:** Prospect Theory has been applied to explain market anomalies and investor behavior, influencing the development of new financial models and trading strategies. Understanding behavioral finance is key to employing Japanese Candlesticks effectively.
• **Medicine:** The concept of framing effects has been used to improve communication between doctors and patients and to encourage better health decisions.
• **Law:** Tversky’s research on eyewitness testimony has been used to improve the reliability of legal proceedings.
• **Political Science:** His work on heuristics and biases has been applied to understand political decision-making and voting behavior.

Tversky’s influence continues to be felt today. His ideas are widely taught in universities and business schools around the world. His work has helped to create a more realistic and nuanced understanding of human behavior. The principles discovered by Tversky and Kahneman are essential for understanding Chart Patterns and avoiding common trading mistakes. They provide a framework for developing more robust and adaptable Trading Systems. His work also underscores the importance of Risk-Reward Ratio assessment, acknowledging the psychological impact of potential losses. The study of Correlation and its potential misinterpretation is also heavily influenced by Tversky's research. Furthermore, understanding the impact of Volume on price action benefits from the insights gained from his work. The application of Ichimoku Cloud relies on understanding how traders perceive and react to market signals, a concept central to Tversky's research. Even the use of MACD and its interpretation is subject to the biases Tversky identified. The effectiveness of Stochastic Oscillator signals can be undermined by overconfidence bias. Analyzing Relative Strength Index (RSI) requires awareness of confirmation bias. The application of Average True Range (ATR) for volatility assessment is influenced by how individuals perceive risk. Understanding Donchian Channels and their interpretation benefits from recognizing the availability heuristic. The use of Parabolic SAR relies on recognizing patterns, which is susceptible to the representativeness heuristic. The effectiveness of Pivot Points depends on overcoming anchoring bias. The analysis of Harmonic Patterns is prone to confirmation bias. The interpretation of Wavelet Analysis requires a critical assessment of statistical reasoning. Finally, even the use of Renko Charts is subject to the framing effect – how the chart is presented impacts perception.

Personal Life and Death

Amos Tversky married Barbara Liberman in 1963. They had two children, Daniel and Shirly. He was known for his warmth, wit, and intellectual generosity. Tversky died of melanoma at the age of 59 in 1996. His untimely death was a significant loss to the scientific community.

Start Trading Now

Sign up at IQ Option (Minimum deposit $10) Open an account at Pocket Option (Minimum deposit $5)

Join Our Community

Subscribe to our Telegram channel @strategybin to receive: ✓ Daily trading signals ✓ Exclusive strategy analysis ✓ Market trend alerts ✓ Educational materials for beginners